ISSN: 2536-7080
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/RJFSN
Start Year: 2016
Email: rjfsn@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/RJFSN2022.147 | Article Number: 0C8331DA2 | Vol.7 (3) - August 2022
Received Date: 25 July 2022 | Accepted Date: 29 August 2022 | Published Date: 30 August 2022
Authors: Wasihun Wale Eyesa* and Ermias Dureto Badebo
Keywords: sweet potato., sensory acceptability, Physic-chemical properties, storage conditions
The effect of different storage conditions (pit, sack, wooden box and clump) on the physico-chemical and sensory acceptability of sweet potatoes was conducted. Sweet potatoes were stored in the four storage conditions and untreated sweet potatoes (control) were used for this study. In four storage conditions, 10 kg of freshly harvested sweet potatoes were stored until the end of four storage months. Per cent of weight loss, sprouting, and spoilage of sweet potatoes data were collected from storage conditions in monthly intervals. All samples were analyzed for physic-chemical properties at Hawassa University, Food Chemistry and Food Microbiology Laboratory, and sensory acceptability was evaluated by using untrained 45 panellists at the end of the storage period. Completely Randomized Design (CRD) was used for storage conditions with three replication. The mean scores of appearance, taste, flavour, smell, and texture of sweet potato in storage conditions at the end of four months and untreated sweet potatoes had not shown significant difference except for overall acceptability of sweet potato. The mean scores of moisture and protein of sweet potato samples had not shown significant (p<0.05) differences in all storage conditions and untreated sweet potatoes. The pit storage scored the highest mean of moisture (71.30), ash (1.53), protein (6.73), fat (4.66) and fiber (1.76) than other storage conditions but less than untreated sweet potato except for fiber content of pit storage. The least mean per cent of weight loss (26.45), sprouting (9.72), and spoilage (2.87) of sweet potato was recorded at pit storage than in other storage conditions at the end of the fourth month. It was concluded that pit is storage preferable to other storage conditions based on weight loss, sprouting, spoilage, better physic-chemical and sensory acceptability, and recommended to farmers for storing sweet potatoes. Further study will be needed on the microbial quality of sweet potatoes in different storage conditions during storage periods.
AOAC (2000). Association of Official and Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis, Washington D.C. 17th edition, Vol. 2 | ||||
AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, 16th edition. Washington DC, U.S.A. p.19 | ||||
Awojobi, B. F. (2004). Indigenous knowledge in potato utilization, processing and preservation. In: Olakesusi, F. (eds). Proceedings of Post-Harvest seminar (pp1-127). Ilorin: Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute. | ||||
Bidzakin, J. K., Acheremu, K., & Carey, E. E. (2014). Needs assessment of sweet potato production in northern Ghana: implications for research and extension efforts. ARPN Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, 9(9), 315-319. | ||||
Chagonda, I., Mapfeka, R. F., & Chitata, T. (2014). Effect of tillage systems and vine orientation on yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5(21), 3159-3165. Crossref |
||||
Dandago, M. A., & Gungula, D. T. (2011). Effects of various storage methods on the quality and nutritional composition of sweet potato (Ipomea batatas L.) in Yola Nigeria. International Food Research Journal, 18(1), 271-278. | ||||
Delaplace, P., Brostaux, Y., Fauconnier, M. L., & du Jardin, P. (2008). Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber physiological age index is a valid reference frame in postharvest ageing studies. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 50(1), 103-106. Crossref |
||||
Elameen, A., Fjellheim, S., Larsen, A., Rognli, O. A., Sundheim, L., Msolla, S., Masumba, E., Mtunda, K., & Klemsdal, S. S. (2008). Analysis of genetic diversity in a sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) germplasm collection from Tanzania as revealed by AFLP. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 55(3), 397-408. Crossref |
||||
FAO (2015). Statistical databases. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. | ||||
Markos, D., & Loha, G. (2016). Sweet potato agronomy research in Ethiopia: Summary of past findings and future research directions. Agriculture and Food Sciences Research, 3(1), 1-11. Crossref |
||||
Munish, S., Nehra, B. K., Narendra, S., & Khurana, S. C. (2006). Storage behaviour of potato under ambient condition affected by curing and crop duration. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 35(3/4), 357-360. | ||||
Olokesusi, F. (2004, August). Indigenous knowledge research development in post-harvest management of root and tuber crops. In: International Seminar on Indigenous Knowledge dind Post-Harvest Handling of Root and Tuber Crops organized by NISPRI, Ilorin and IFAD, Rome, held in Ilorin (pp. 23-25). | ||||
Ray, R. C., & Ravi, V. (2005). Post-harvest spoilage of sweet potato in tropics and control measures. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 45(7-8), 623-644. Crossref |
||||
Yakubu, D. A. (2000). A study of various local methods of potato storage. Kaduna, Nigeria. Kaduna Polytechnic, National Diploma project (unpublished). |