ISSN: 2536-7099
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASVM
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasvm@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2023.373 | Article Number: 2DB202949 | Vol.8 (4) - August 2023
Received Date: 04 April 2023 | Accepted Date: 19 July 2023 | Published Date: 30 August 2023
Authors: Usoro, O. O.* , Christopher, G. I. , Ndak, U. U. , Williams, M. and Utin, E.
Keywords: cost, performance., finisher broilers, influence, modified feed troughs
An experiment was conducted to study the influence of modified feed troughs on the performance and cost of production of finisher broilers. A total of ninety (90) 4 weeks old birds were used for the experiment. They were divided into three treatments of thirty (30) birds each and replicated three times with ten (10) birds each, using a completely Randomized Design (CRD). The treatment groups were assigned with different feed troughs such that treatment 1 had the Conventional Feed Trough (CFT), treatment 2 had Beveled Edge Feed trough (BEF) and treatment 3 had the Partitioned Feed Trough (PFT). The birds were fed isonitrogenous and isocaloric commercial diet. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Data were collected on initial body weight, final body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio. Carcass characteristics and economics of production were further used to calculate the performance of finisher broilers under the three treatments. The data obtained were subjected to analysis variance and significant means were separated using Duncan multiple range test. Birds fed with the (BEF) showed highest significant (p<0.05) final body weight of 2853.33 g, total body weight gain of 1814.4 g per bird, total feed intake of 3122.96 g and best feed conversion ratio of 1.75 compared with birds under CFT and PFT. The results obtained for carcass analysis indicated that birds under BEF and PFT had significantly (p<0.05) higher weights of breast, wing, back, shank, heart and gizzard than CFT. The BEF gave the lowest unit cost of production of the finisher broiler (N1185.60) against the N1329.84 and N1324.47 for CFT and PFT respectively. The BEF is therefore adjudged best and recommended in controlling feed wastage and improving the performance of finisher broilers.
| AKSG Online (2023). Akwa Ibom State: Geography and Location. Link |
||||
| Alphonsus, C., Sam, I. M., Opoola, E., & Ayigun, A. E. (2012). Correlated relationship amongst performance and carcass characteristics in broiler chickens raised to maturity. Animal Production Research Advances, 8(1), 50-53. | ||||
| Arcuri, L. (2017). Types of commercial chicken or poultry feed - How to choose feed for your chickens. Link |
||||
| Buskirk, D. D., Zanella, A. J., Harrigan, T. M., Van Lente, J. L., Gnagey, L. M., & Kaercher, M. J. (2003). Large round bale feeder design affects hay utilization and beef cow behavior. Journal of Animal Science, 81(1), 109-115. Crossref |
||||
| Chehraghi, M., Zakeri, A., & Taghinejad-Roudbaneh, M. (2013). Effects of different feed forms on performance in broiler chickens. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(4), 66-70. | ||||
| Essien, C. A., & Sam, I. M. (2018). Effect of Anthonotha macrophylla (African beans) leaf meal on the blood profiles of finishing broiler chickens. International Journal of Agriculture: Research and Review, 6(1), 43-48. | ||||
| Farmers Joint (2018). Avoiding feed wastage in poultry. Link |
||||
| Gadzirayi, C. T., Mutandwa, E., Chihiya, J., & Mlambo, R. (2006). A comparative economic analysis of mash and pelleted feed in broiler production under deep litter housing system. International Journal of Poultry Science, 7, 629-631. Crossref |
||||
| Isaac, L. J., Udo, U. H., Usoro, O. O., Ekanem, E., & Williams, M. E. (2011). Relationship between body weight and linear body measurements in different breeds of rabbits. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of Nigerian Society of Animal Production. | ||||
| Leone, E. H., Christman, M. C., Douglass, L., & Estevez, I. (2010). Separating the impact of group size, density, and enclosure size on broiler movement and space use at a decreasing perimeter to area ratio. Behavioural Processes, 83(1), 16-22. Crossref |
||||
| Nesheim, N. C., Austic, R. E., & Card, L. e. (1979). Poultry Production (12th Edition). Coll. Mag. Press Co. Hutchinson, London. | ||||
| Neves, D. P., Banhazi, T. M., & Nääs, I. A. (2014). Feeding behaviour of broiler chickens: a review on the biomechanical characteristics. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 16, 01-16. Crossref |
||||
| Neves, D. P., Nääs, I. A., Vercellino, R. D. A., & de Moura, D. J. (2010). Do broilers prefer to eat from a certain type of feeder? Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 12(3), 179-187. Crossref |
||||
| Owners Builders Network (2016). 6 Clever solutions to reduce chicken feed waste. Link |
||||
| Sam, I. M., Akpa, G. N., Alphonsus, C. G., Iyeghe-Erakpotobor, I., & Agubosi, O. C. P. (2010). Effect of sex separation on growth performance and carcass characteristics of broilers raised to maturity. Continental Journal of Animal and Veterinary Research, 2(1), 35-40. | ||||
| Sam, I. M., Essien, C. A., Ukpanah, U. A., & Ekpo, J. S. (2019). Influence of sex on relationship between morphometric trait measurement and carcass traits in broiler chicken raised in humid tropic. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 18(11), 309-314. Crossref |
||||
| Scott, T. A. (2005). Variation in feed intake of broiler chickens. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, 15, 237-244. | ||||
| Simon Kern, M. S. (2015). Advantages of Pelleted Swine Grow-Finish Feed. Form A Feed. Link |
||||
| Usoro, O. O., & Christopher, G. I. (2022). Efficacy of grit and Enzyme supplementation in Brewers' Spent Grains-Based diets for Broilers. International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 25(1), 6216-6224 | ||||
| Williams, M. E., Igile, G. O., Usoro, O. O., & Offiong, E. (2017). Assessment of heavy metals in body muscles/organs of locally reared poultry in cocoa and non-cocoa producing areas of Cross River State, Nigeria. J Anim Sci Vet Med, 2(3), 72-78. Crossref |
||||
| Wolter, B. F., Ellis, M., Curtis, S. E., Parr, E. N., & Webel, D. M. (2000). Group size and floor-space allowance can affect weanling-pig performance. Journal of Animal Science, 78(8), 2062-2067. Crossref |
||||