ISSN: 2536-7099
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASVM
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasvm@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2026.656 | Article Number: 079460B77 | Vol.11 (4) - August 2026
Received Date: 09 April 2026 | Accepted Date: 25 June 2026 | Published Date: 08 August 2026
Authors: Sherifah Adunni Olaoye* , Ademidun Olanrewaju and Okhiomah Ahmed Abu
Keywords: rats, processing, sorrel seed., Casein, protein quality
The use of non-conventional feed resources either as replacement or as a supplement in the nutrition of livestock cannot be overemphasised. The shortage of feed resources for livestock and poultry feeding diverted the majority of research in the field of animal nutrition to look into possibilities to overcome this crisis; however, a possible and perhaps the most viable proposition could be the inclusion of non-conventional feed resources in livestock rations with suitable and complete feed technology that can utilise the feed sources with maximum efficiency. Therefore, this study was carried out to estimate the protein quality of raw and processed sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed, and how well the protein is digested, absorbed and utilised in Wistar rats, before it can be utilised and applied in feeding rabbits. Thirty 3-4-week-old weanling Wistar rats weighing 67.00 ± 0.7 g were randomly allotted into six dietary treatments of five rats each and fed the experimental diets for 28 days. The dietary layout was: T1 = (control) casein, T2 = raw sorrel seed, T3 = boiled sorrel seed, T4 = soaked sorrel seed, T5 = fermented sorrel seed, T6 = nitrogen-free diet. Growth performance, protein quality indices, serum biochemical indices and relative organ weights were assessed. The results showed that the average daily weight gain value (1.73 g) recorded in the casein-based diet (Control) was similar to the values recorded in boiled (1.18 g), soaked (1.34 g), and fermented sorrel seed meal (1.26 g) when compared with rats fed raw sorrel seeds (0.68 g) and that of the nitrogen-free diet groups (-1.36 g). Feed conversion ratio and protein efficiency ratio, however, showed a similar trend for both rats on the control and processed sorrel seed-based groups. There were, however, no significant differences (p>0.05) in the values recorded for crude protein digestibility, biological value, Net protein ratio and nitrogen retention of the casein-based diet and that of the soaked sorrel seed meal group. The total protein recorded in rats fed the casein-based diet did not differ significantly (p>0.05) from the rats fed the processed sorrel seed meal groups. In addition, albumin and globulin values showed a similar trend. The Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) and Urea levels recorded in rats fed casein-based diets did not differ significantly (p>0.05) from the values recorded in rats fed processed sorrel seed meal. The relative organ weights of Wistar rats fed a casein-based diet, raw, processed sorrel seed and a nitrogen-free diet on kidney, spleen, liver, lungs and heart were recorded. However, there were no significant (p>0.05) differences in the values recorded in liver and lungs, while the values obtained for the kidney, spleen and heart differed significantly (p<0.05) among the treatment groups. It was concluded that rats fed soaked sorrel seed meal gave similar results to the control (casein-based diet) because it enhanced average daily weight gain, crude protein digestibility, biological value, and net protein utilisation.
| Abu, O. A., Amusa, O. H., Atoyebi, R. O., Kehinde, R. A., & Nworgu, F. C. (2013). Growth performance and nutrient digestibility of Wistar albino rats fed processed dehulled jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis). Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 40(2), 104-111. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v40i2.1125 |
||||
| ACUREC (2021). Animal Care and Use Research Ethics Committee Training Manual. A Publication of University of Ibadan Press. | ||||
| Adigun, J. A. (2003). Effect of intra-row spacing and weed control on growth and yield of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) in South Western Nigeria. ASSET Series A 3 (2), 91-98. | ||||
| Agbede, J. O., & Aletor, V. A. (2005). Studies of the chemical composition and protein quality evaluation of differently processed Canavalia ensiformis and Mucuna pruriens seed flours. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 18(1), 89-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2003.10.011 |
||||
| Anonymous (2012). Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Vol. 1. Ottawa, Ontario. Canada, Canadian Council on Animal Care. Pp. 85-90. | ||||
| Ari, M. M., Ayanwale, B. A., Adama, T. Z., & Olatunji, E. A. (2012): Effect of Different Fermentation Methods on Growth Indices and serum profile of Broiler Chickens. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Health Care 2(5); 78-86. | ||||
| Babalola, S. O. (2000, November). Chemical analysis of roselle leaf (Hibiscus sabdariffa). In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of NIFST (pp. 228-229). | ||||
| Dairo, F. A. S., Adesehinwa, A. O. K., Oluwasola, T. A., & Oluyemi, J. A. (2010). High and low dietary energy and protein levels for broiler chickens. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(15), 2030-2038. | ||||
| Duke, J. A. (2000). Hibiscus sabdariffa, L. Malvaceae Roselle: handbook of Energy Crops. Rosella zobo. @ananzi.Co accessed on the 11th October, 2003. | ||||
| Duwa, H., Oyawoye, E. O., & Njidda, A. A. (2012). Replacement value of boiled sorrel seed meal for soyabean in broiler diet in semi-arid zone of Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 11(6), 572-579. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2012.572.579 |
||||
| Ferrare, L. A., Innelli, P., Palmieri, V., Limauro, S., Deluca, G., Ferrare, F., Liccardo, E., & Celentano, A. (2006). Effect of different dietary protein intakes on body composition and vascular reactivity. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 60(5), 643-943. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602363 |
||||
| Giami, S. Y. (2005). Compositional and nutritional properties of selected newly developed lines of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.Walp). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis,18, 665-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2004.06.007 |
||||
| Halimatul, S. M. M., Amin, I., Mohd-Esa, N., Nawalyah, A. G., & Siti Muskinah, M. 2007. Protein Quality of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Asian Food Journal, 14(2), 131-140. | ||||
| Hansawadi, C., & Kawabata, J. (2000). Alpha-Amylase inhibitors from Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa) Linn tea. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 64, 1041-1043. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.64.1041 |
||||
| Hernández-Infante, M., Herrador-Rena, G., & Sotelo-Lopex, A. (1979). Nutritive value of different beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) supplemented with methionine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,27:965-968. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60225a050 |
||||
| Igwebuike, J. U., Kwari. I. D., Diarra, S. S., Maggawa, D. O., Garba, A. P., & Musa, R. (2010). Replacement value of sprouted sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa) seed meal for groundnut cake in the diet of growing rabbits. Journal of Environmental Issues and Agriculture in Developing Countries, 2(1), 82-93. | ||||
| Iyakutye, J. N., Onyema, J. O., & Owuno, F. 2023.Anti-Nutritional Factors in Animal Feed Stuffs. International Journal of Research and Review, 10 (2), 226-244. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230229 |
||||
| Keyembe, N. C. (2011). Germination as a processing technique for soybeans in small scale broiler farming, M. inst. Agrar Dissertation, University of Pretoria, South Africa. | ||||
| Kwari, I. D. (2009). Evaluation of sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) seed meal as an alternative protein source in the diets of domestic chickens. PhD Thesis submitted to the School of Postgraduate Studies, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri. | ||||
| Kwari, I. D., Diarra, S. S., Saleh, B., Vovoa, P. R., Ramat, O. A., & Tochukwu, D. (2011). Growth, haematology and serology of broiler chickens fed different cultivars of sorghum as replacement for maize in the semi-arid zone of Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10, 608-612. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2011.608.612 |
||||
| Manjula, K., & Krishna, R. (2016). Feed efficiency and serum biochemical profile of wistar rats fed with spirulina as functional food. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science, 4(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.12944/CRNFSJ.4.2.07 |
||||
| Mohammed, S. F., & Ismail, B. B. (2014). Comparison on two methods of preparation of zobo drink on the survival of Bacillus species. American Journal of Food Technology, 9(4), 200-208. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2014.200.208 |
||||
| Mwasaru, M. A., Muhammad, K., Bakar, J., & Man, Y. B. C. (1999). Effects of isolation technique and conditions on the extractability, physicochemical and functional properties of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) protein isolates. I. Physicochemical properties. Food Chemistry, 67(4), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00150-8 |
||||
| Njidda, A. A., Igwebuike, J. U., Ngoshe, A. A., & Tijjani, A. O. (2006). Effect of substituting maize with graded levels of cane molasses on the performance of broiler finisher birds in the semi-arid region of Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture Environment, 8(1), 1-13. | ||||
| Nyameh, J., Ribanre, A. J., Alabi, J., Mufwa, B. J., & Gyau, A. M. (2012). Effect of Processing on the performance and carcass yield of Broilers Fed Differently processed sorrel (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.). Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 4,1-4 | ||||
| Rajkumar, R., Sureshkumar, S., Natarajan, A., Chandirasekaran, V., & Geetha, M. (2021). Growth performance of Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) fed with different formulations of dry pet kibble. The Pharma Innovation Journal, SP-10(9), 702-706. | ||||
| Rao, P. U., & Deosthale, Y. G. (1982). Tannin content of pulses: varietal differences and effects of germination and cooking. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 33(10), 1013-1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740331012 |
||||
| Sahlu, T., Goetsch, A. L., Luo, J., Nsahlai, I. V., Moore, J. E., Galyean, M. L., Owens, F. N., Ferrell, C. L., & Johnson, Z. B. (2004). Nutrient requirements of goats: developed equations, other considerations and future research to improve them. Small Ruminant Research, 53(3), 191-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.04.001 |
||||
| SAS (2020). SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. | ||||
| Soetan, K. O., & Oyewole, O. E. (2009). The need for adequate processing to reduce the anti-nutritional factors in plants used as human foods and animal feeds: A review. African Journal of Food Science, 3(9), 223-232. | ||||
| Udoyong, A. O., Kibon, A., Yahaya, S. M., Yakubu, B., Augustine, C., & Isaac, L. (2010). Haematological responses in serum biochemistry of broiler chickens fed graded level of enzyme (Maxigrain®) supplemented cassava peel meal based diet. Global Journal of Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 5(2), 116-119. | ||||