ISSN: 2636-5995
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/IJET
Start Year: 2016
Email: ijet@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/IJET2020.071 | Article Number: 422B060E1 | Vol.4 (2) - June 2020
Received Date: 06 February 2020 | Accepted Date: 12 June 2020 | Published Date: 30 June 2020
Authors: Solomon Melesse Mengistie* , Alemayehu Bishaw Tamiru and Assaye Ayalew Abebe
Keywords: Quality, Difficulty level test, learning improvement, mathematics, problem solving
Quality in education is an amorphous term where no two people can exactly communicate. However, there is a growing trend that quality should be viewed in terms of learning improvement. Thus, this study intends to examine the status of students’ problem solving skill in mathematics. Particularly, this study aims at measuring grades 9 and 10 students’ problem solving skill improvement in mathematics. This study also compared male and female students’ problem solving skill in mathematics. A total of 284 students (142 female and 142 male) were selected using stratified random sampling technique from grades 9 and 10 students. Fifteen problem solving skill test items with five levels of difficulty were constructed based on the conceptual framework, which was suggested by the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science of Saint Louis University and Mara University of Technology. The results of the analysis unraveled that grades 9 and 10 students have low level of problem solving skill in mathematics. As the difficulty level of items increases, there appeared to be significant difference on students’ problem solving skill in favor of male students. Based on the results, the researchers noted that problem solving skill is the result of the combination of a multitude of human skills. It is also manifested in several ways, such as, thinking, reasoning, doing things, etc. Thus, to measure the problem solving skill of people, a combination of tests that address several components of problem solving should be used. Moreover, the problem solving skill development requires models that could possibly help the students to emulate the skill. To this end, teachers should develop their problem solving skill and thereby become good models for their respective students.
Alemayehu, B. (2008). Hidden Curriculum: Impact Analysis on Multiculturalism in Higher Learning Institutions of Ethiopia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Delhi, India. | ||||
Alemayehu, B. (2010). Teachers' beliefs and actual practice of problem solving approach in teaching mathematics (with particular reference to grades 9 and 10 in West Gojjam). Ethiopian Journal of Education and Sciences, 6(1), 73-87. Crossref |
||||
Alemayehu, B., & Assaye, A. (2013). An evaluation of grades 9 and 10 mathematics textbooks vis--vis fostering problem solving skills. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(15), 1314-1321. | ||||
Apple, M. W. (1980). Ideology and Curriculum (2nd ed.). New York; Routledge. Crossref |
||||
Banks, A., & Banks M. (1997). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (3rd ed.). U.S.A. John Wiley and Sons Inc. | ||||
Burns, M. (1992). About teaching mathematics: AK-8 resources. New York: Maths solutions Publications. | ||||
Cahil, L. (2005). His brain, her brain. Scientific American, 292(5), 40-47. Crossref |
||||
Callas, D. (1993). Differences in mathematics achievement between males and females. Community College Review, 21(3), 62-67. Crossref |
||||
Charles, R., & Lester, F. C. (1987). How to evaluate progress in problem solving. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1906 Association Drive, Reston, VA 22901. | ||||
Fel'dman, G. M. (1990). Characterization of the Gaussian distribution on groups by the independence of linear statistics. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 31(2), 336-345. Crossref |
||||
Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. In: Iran Nejad, A., & Pearson, P. D. (eds). Review research in education (pp. 355-392). The American Educational Research Association, Washington D. C. Crossref |
||||
Huntley, M. A., Rasmussen, C. L., Villarubi, R. S., Sangtong, J., & Fey, J. T. (2000). Effects of standards-based mathematics education: A study of the Core-Plus Mathematics Project algebra and functions strand. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(3), 328-361. | ||||
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495. Crossref |
||||
Kilpatrick, J. (2003). What works? In: Senk, S., & Thompson, D. (Eds). Standards-Based school Mathematics curriculum (pp. 471-488). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum. Crossref |
||||
Lue, N. K., Hwa, T. Y., Laus, H., & Limok, S. (2009). The thinking progress of mathematics problem solving of form four secondary school students. Institute of Research, development and Commercialization of Research Report. Mara University of Technology. | ||||
Matthew, S. M., & Joshua, A. (2007). Stereotype Threat and female students' Math Achievement. Community Currents. Link |
||||
McIntosh, R., & Jarrett, D. (2000). Teaching mathematical problem solving: Implementing the vision: A literature review. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. | ||||
Melesse, S. (2014). Higher learning institute module organization vis-à-vis the criteria of curriculum development for problem solving skill development. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 5(3), 13-17. | ||||
Melesse, S. (2015). The effect of some constraints on mathematics instructors' problem solving practices: Universities in Amhara Region in Focus. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 4(4), 174-181. Crossref |
||||
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2004). Standards for school mathematics problem solving. Reston, VA. | ||||
Polya, G. (1995). How to solve it. A new as part of mathematics method. Stanford University, Principle hall of India; New Delhi. | ||||
School Achievement Indicator Program (SAIP) (1997). Mathematics Assessment Criteria. Canada: Council of Ministry of Education. | ||||
Zanzali, N. A. A., & Lui, L. N. (2000). Evaluating the levels of problem solving abilities in mathematics. Universiti Teknologi, Malaysia. |