ISSN: 2536-7099
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASVM
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasvm@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2024.435 | Article Number: CC1C4CC36 | Vol.9 (3) - June 2024
Received Date: 09 July 2024 | Accepted Date: 09 July 2024 | Published Date: 30 June 2024
Authors: Jeremiah, Taiwo Boluwatife* , Abdulrahman, Taofeek , Akinyemi, Moses Olusegun , Ayinde, Omolara , Toyinbo, Hezekiah Ojuola and Olaoye, Matthew Olayinka
Keywords: Emergence, broiler chicken, Behavioural traits, fear, tonic immobility
The impact of breed on various behavioural traits has been documented across numerous avian species; however, there exists a scarcity of studies focusing on commonly raised broiler chickens. Fear, characterised as a detrimental affective state, serves as an indicator of distress and is correlated with adverse implications for the welfare and productivity of livestock. This investigation sought to evaluate fear-related behaviours in commonly raised broiler chickens of four distinct genotypes (Arbor Acres, Hubbard, Ross, and Cobb) at weeks 3, 5, 7, and 9 of age. A total of 140 birds (35 individuals per breed) were utilized, all derived from a common genetic lineage. Tonic immobility and emergence tests were conducted at weeks 3, 5, 7, and 9, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed employing Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. At the 3rd week of observation, the duration of tonic immobility exhibited a significant association with the breed (χ2=10.686, DF=3, p=0.014); however, this association was not significant by the 7th week (χ2=6.349, DF=3, p=0.096). Moreover, the latency to emerge from a dark enclosure was significantly influenced by plumage colour (χ2 =8.9229, DF=2, p = 0.01), with the shortest emergence latency recorded in black NIT. Breed significantly affected the latency to emerge from the box at both observation weeks (χ2=20.224, DF=3, p= 0.00 and χ2=19.419, DF=3, p=0.00). Conversely, no significant effects of sex were observed on the duration of tonic immobility at either observation week (Ų =2344.500, ž=-0.366, p=0.714 and Ų=2135.500, ž=-1.094, p=0.274). While the latency to emerge from the box was not significantly associated with sex at the 7th week of observation, a significant association was noted with the breed at the 9th week (Ų =2285.000, ž=-0.673, p=.501 and Ų=1883.500, ž=-2.230, p=.026). Remarkably, at the 9th week, females displayed a shorter latency to emerge from the box compared to males, indicating varying fear responses. In conclusion, breed exerted a discernible influence on fear levels in commonly raised broiler chickens, with Hubbard birds demonstrating the highest level of fear across two statistically significant fear indicators (prolonged emergence duration and tonic immobility).
| Altan, Ö. Z. G. E., Pabuçcuoğlu, A., Altan, A., Konyalioğlu, S., & Bayraktar, H. (2003). Effect of heat stress on oxidative stress, lipid peroxidation and some stress parameters in broilers. British Poultry Science, 44(4), 545-550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660310001618334 |
||||
| Amos, T. T. (2006). Analysis of backyard poultry production in Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 5(3), 247-250. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.247.250 |
||||
| Bracke, M. B. M., & Hopster, H. (2006). Assessing the importance of natural behavior for animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(1), 77-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-4493-7 |
||||
| Brambell, F. W. R. (1965). Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. | ||||
| De Haas, E. N., Kemp, B., Bolhuis, J. E., Groothuis, T., & Rodenburg, T. B. (2013). Fear, stress, and feather pecking in commercial white and brown laying hen parent-stock flocks and their relationships with production parameters. Poultry Science, 92(9), 2259-2269. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02996 |
||||
| Duncan, I. J. H. (2005). Science-based assessment of animal welfare: Farm animals. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 24(2), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.24.2.1587 |
||||
| Durosaro, S. O., Iyasere, O. S., Oguntade, D. O., Ilori, B. M., Odubola, T. A., Adewunmi, A. P., Oyeniran, V. J., & Ozoje, M. O. (2021). Associations between plumage colour and fear behaviour in young Nigerian indigenous turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 244, 105483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105483 |
||||
| Durosaro, S. O., Iyasere, O. S., Oguntade, D. O., Ilori, B. M., Oyeniran, V. J., Eniafe, T. E., Adeyemi, R.O., Adu, S. E., & Ozoje, M. O. (2023). Effect of genotype on growth, fear-related behaviours, and walking ability of FUNAAB Alpha broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 267, 106035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106035 |
||||
| Emaikwu, K., Chikwendu, D. O., & Sani, R. M. (2011). Determinants of flock size in broiler production in Kaduna State of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 3(11), 202-211. | ||||
| Fraser, D. (2003). Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: The interplay of science and values. Animal Welfare, 12(4), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962728600026038 |
||||
| FAOSTAT (2007). Food and Agriculture Organization statistical database. CDROM. | ||||
| FAOSTAT (2020). Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations. 366p. | ||||
| Gallup Jr, G. G. (1977). Tonic immobility: The role of fear and predation. The Psychological Record, 27(Suppl 1), 41-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394432 |
||||
| Gentle, M. J., Jones, R. B., & Woolley, S. C. (1989). Physiological changes during tonic immobility in Gallus gallus var domesticus. Physiology and Behavior, 46(5), 843-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(89)90046-2 |
||||
| Hemsworth, P. H., & Coleman, G. J. (1998). Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity and Welfare of Intensively Farmed Animals. CABI. | ||||
| Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., Barnett, J. L., & Jones, R. B. (1994). Behavioural responses to humans and the productivity of commercial broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 41(1-2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(94)90055-8 |
||||
| International Finance Corporation (IFC) (2014). Good Practice note: Improving animal welfare in livestock operations. World Bank Group. | ||||
| Jensen, P., & Toates, F. M. (1993). Who needs 'behavioural needs'? Motivational aspects of the needs of animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 37(1), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90108-2 |
||||
| Jones, R. B. (1987). Assessment of fear in adult laying hens: correlational analysis of methods and measures. British Poultry Science, 28(2), 319-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668708416964 |
||||
| Jones, R. B. (1996). Fear and adaptability in poultry: insights, implications and imperatives. World's Poultry Science Journal, 52(2), 131-174. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19960013 |
||||
| Nakasai, E., Tanizawa, H., Takawaki, M., Yanagita, K., Kawakami, S. I., Oka, T., ... & Bungo, T. (2013). Age-dependent change of tonic immobility response in chicks of a native Japanese chicken breed, Tosa-Jidori. The Journal of Poultry Science, 50(4), 321-325. https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0130018 |
||||
| SAS Institute (2002). SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 9. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. | ||||
| Sims, J. T., Bergström, L., Bowman, B. T., & Oenema, O. J. S. U. (2005). Nutrient management for intensive animal agriculture: policies and practices for sustainability. Soil Use and Management, 21, 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2005.tb00118.x |
||||
| Taskin, A., Karadavut, U., & Çayan, H. (2018). Behavioural responses of white and bronze turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) to tonic immobility, gait score and open field tests in free-range system. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 1253-1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2018.1495642 |
||||