ISSN: 2536-7099
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASVM
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasvm@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2021.252 | Article Number: 71824A4A6 | Vol.6 (1) - February 2021
Received Date: 01 February 2021 | Accepted Date: 19 February 2021 | Published Date: 28 February 2021
Authors: Agboola, A. F.* , Omidiwura, B. R. O. , Ahmed, R. O. , Soneye, V. F. and Majolagbe, H. O.
Keywords: histology, Broilers, growth response, feed additives
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of enzyme, probiotic or their combinations on growth response, microbiota and gut histopathological indices of broiler chicken. One hundred and fifty (150) one-day old unsexed Arbor Acre broiler chicks were weighed and randomly allotted to 5 dietary treatments; each diet had 5 replicates of 6 birds each in the study that lasted for 42 days. Treatment 1 consists of the basal diet (negative control; NC): Treatment 2 was NC+0.1% antibiotic (positive control), Treatment 3: NC+0.4% probiotic, Treatment 4: NC+0.1% enzyme and Treatment 5: NC+0.4% probiotic+0.1% enzyme. Performance indices were measured. On day 42, ileal digesta was collected from two birds per replicate for microbial count while about 5 cm of distal ileum was severed for histopathology. The results showed that diets had no significant (p>0.05) effect on the performance of birds at the starter and finisher phases. Total heterotrophic counts of birds fed with basal and probiotic diets were similar but significantly (p<0.05) higher than other diets. The highest Lactobacilli count was recorded in the mixture of probiotic + enzyme diet while least was observed in probiotic (2.58×105 cfu/ml) and enzyme supplemented diets (1.45×105 cfu/ml). Total coliform count of birds fed antibiotic diet was significantly (p<0.05) lower (14.12×105 cfu/ml) than for those on other diets. Total Escherichia coli count was highest in birds fed antibiotic while least was observed in birds fed mixture of probiotics + enzyme diet. Photomicrographs of the ileum of birds fed basal diet showed sloughed mucosa layer and degenerated villi. However birds fed antibiotic, probiotic, enzyme or probiotic+enzyme diets showed normal mucosa layer with normal villi, the lamina proprial showed normal tissues with mild infiltrate. In conclusion, feed supplements used in this study can serve as viable alternatives to antibiotics in broiler nutrition without compromising birds’ health.
Aftab, U., & Bedford, M. R. (2018). The use of NSP enzymes in poultry nutrition: myths and realities. World's Poultry Science Journal, 74(2), 277-286. Crossref |
||||
Agboola, A. F., Omidiwura, B. R. O., Odu, O., Adeyemi, W. T., Suberu, S. A., Aroniyo, I., & Iyayi, E. A. (2014). Influence of dietary supplementation of probiotics and symbiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and organ weights in turkey poults. Ibadan Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(1), 1-12. | ||||
Agboola, A. F., Omidiwura, B. R. O., Ahmed, R. O., & Ayoola, O. D. (2019). Influence of Butyric Acid Supplemented Diets on Growth Response, Precaecal Nutrient Digestibility, Gut Morphology and Histopathological Measurements in Broiler Chickens. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 46 (4), 117-133 | ||||
AOAC (2000). Official methods of analysis. 17th edition, The association of official analytical chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. | ||||
Bidarkar, V. K., Swain, P. S., Ray, S., & Dominic, G. (2014). Probiotics. Potential alternative to antibiotics in ruminant feeding. Trend in Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 1(1), 1-4. | ||||
Biswas, A., Junaid, N., Kumawat, M., Qureshi, S., & Mandal, A.B. (2018). Influence of dietary supplementation of probiotics on intestinal histo-morphometry, blood chemistry and gut health status of broiler chickens. South African Journal of Animal Science, 48(5), 965-976. Crossref |
||||
Brenes, A., Smith, M., Guenter, W., & Marquardt, R. R. (1993). Effect of enzyme supplementation on the performance and digestive tract size of broiler chickens fed wheat-and barley-based diets. Poultry Science, 72(9), 1731-1739. Crossref |
||||
Comert, N. (2004). The effects of avilamycin, bio-moss, cylactin and yucca schidigera extract added to the corn-soybean meal based diets on fattening performance, slaughter results and some blood and intestinal parameters of male broiler turkey. Ankara University Graduate School of Natural Applied Sciences. PhD thesis. Department of Animal Sciences. Pp 57. | ||||
Cozannet, P., Kidd, M. T., Neto, R. M., & Geraert, P. A. (2017). Next-generation non-starch polysaccharide-degrading, multi-carbohydrase complex rich in xylanase and arabinofuranosidase to enhance broiler feed digestibility. Poultry Science, 96(8), 2743-2750. Crossref |
||||
Engberg, R. M., Hedemann, M. S., Steenfeldt, S., & Jensen, B. B. (2004). Influence of whole wheat and xylanase on broiler performance and microbial composition and activity in the digestive tract. Poultry Science, 83(6), 925-938. Crossref |
||||
Fernandes, B. C. S., Martins, M. R. F. B., Mendes, A. A., Milbradt, E. L., Sanfelice, C., Martins, B. B., Aguiar, E. F., & Bresne, C. (2014). Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 16(4), 417-424. Crossref |
||||
Fuller, R. (1989). Probiotics in man and animals. A review. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 66(5), 365-378. Crossref |
||||
Gheisar, M. M., & Kim, I. H. (2017). Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition - a review. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17(1), 92-99. Crossref |
||||
Heidarpour, F., Mohammadabadi, M. R., Zaidul, I. S. M., Maherani, B., Saari, N., Hamid, A. A., Abas, F., Manap, M. Y. A., & Mozafari, M. R. (2011). Use of prebiotics in oral delivery of bioactive compounds: a nanotechnology perspective. Pharmazie, 66 (5), 319-324. | ||||
Higgins, J. P., Higgins, S. E., Wolfenden, A. D., Henderson, S. N., Torres-Rodriguez, A., Vicente, J. L., Hargis, B. M., & Tellez, G. (2010). Effect of lactic acid bacteria probiotic culture treatment timing on Salmonella enteritidis in neonatal broilers. Poultry Science, 89(2), 243-247. Crossref |
||||
Holdeman, L. V., Cato, E. P., & Moore, E. C. (1977). Anaerobic laboratory manual, Virginia Polytechnique Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. | ||||
Hosseini, S. M., Nazarizadeh, H., Ahani, S., & Vakili Azghandi, M. (2016). Effects of mannan oligosaccharide and Curcuma xanthorrhiza essential oil on the intestinal morphology and stress indicators of broilers subjected to cyclic heat stress. Archives Animal Breeding, 59(2), 285-291. Crossref |
||||
Iji, P. A., Saki, A., & Tivey, D. R. (2001). Body and intestinal growth of broiler chicks on a commercial starter diet. 1. Intestinal weight and mucosal development. British Poultry Science, 42(4), 505-513. Crossref |
||||
Jin, L. Z., Ho, Y. W., Abdullah, N., & Jalaludin, S. (1998). Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science, 77(9), 1259-1265. Crossref |
||||
Khattak, F. M., Pasha, T. N., Hayat, Z. and Mahmud, A. (2006). Enzymes in poultry nutrition. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences,16(1-2), 1-7. | ||||
Kurekci, C., Al Jassim, R., Hassan, E., Bishop-Hurley, S. L., Padmanabha, J., & McSweeney, C. S. (2014). Effects of feeding plant-derived agents on the colonization of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 93(9), 2337-2346. Crossref |
||||
Loddi, M. M., Gonzales, E., Takita, T. S., Mendes, A. A., & Roça, R. D. O. (2000). Effect of the use of probiotic and antibiotic on the performance, yield and carcass quality of broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 29(4), 1124-1131. Crossref |
||||
Maiolino, R., Fioretti, A., Menna, L. F, & Meo, C. (1992). Research on the efficiency of probiotics in diets for broiler chickens. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews Series B, 62, 482. | ||||
Markazi, A. D., Luoma, A., Shanmugasundaram, R., Murugesan, R., Mohnl, M., & Selvaraj, R. (2019). Effect of acidifier product supplementation in laying hens challenged with Salmonella. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 28(4), 919-929. Crossref |
||||
Mathur, S., & Singh, R. (2005). Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria-a review. International journal of food microbiology, 105(3), 281-295. Crossref |
||||
Mehri, M., Adibmoradi, M., Samie, A., & Shivazad, M. (2010). Effects of β-Mannanase on broiler performance, gut morphology and immune system. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(37), 6221-6228. | ||||
Miljkovic, B., Ilic, Z., Strizak, D.M., Jakic, D., & Rajic I. (1997). Acid-pak 4-way in feeding broilers. Zivinarstvo, 32, 7-8. | ||||
Mountzouris, K., Balaskas, C., Xanthakos, I., & Tzivinikou, A. (2009). Effects of a multi-species probiotic on biomarkers of competitive exclusion efficacy in broilers challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. British Poultry Science, 50(4), 467-78. Crossref |
||||
Mountzouris, K.C., Tsitrsikos, P., Palamidi, I., Arvaniti, A., Mohnl, M., Schatzmayr, G., & Fegeros, K. (2010). Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science, 89(1), 58-67. Crossref |
||||
NAFDAC (2018). National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (Press release on antimicrobial resistance. July 25, 2018. | ||||
NRC (1994). National Research Council, Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Revised Edition. National Academy Press, Washington DC. | ||||
Patterson, J. A., & Burkholder. K. M. (2003). Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science, 82(4), 627-631. Crossref |
||||
Rexen, B. (1981). Use of enzymes for improvement of feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 6, 105-114. Crossref |
||||
Rolfe, R. D. (2000). The role of probiotic cultures on gastrointestinal health. Journal of Nutrition,130(2S Suppl), 396S-402S. Crossref |
||||
Saleh, A. A., Kirrella, A. A., Abdo, S. E., Mousa, M. M., Badwi, N. A., Ebeid, T. A., Nada, A. L., & Mohamed, M. A. (2019). Effects of dietary xylanase and arabinofuranosidase combination on the growth performance, lipid peroxidation, blood constituents, and immune response of broilers fed low-energy diets. Animals, 9(7), 1-12. Crossref |
||||
Salim, H.M., Kang, H. K., Akter, N., Kim, D. W., Kim, J. H., Kim, M. J., Na, J. C., Jong, H. B., Choi, H. C., Suh, O. S., & Kim, W. K. (2013). Supplementation of direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population, and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 92(8), 2084-2090. Crossref |
||||
SAS (2012). Statistical Analysis System, User's Guide. Statistical. Version 9.1th ed. SAS. Inst. Inc. Cary. N.C. USA. | ||||
Stanton, T. B. (2013). A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends in Microbiology, 21(3), 111-113. Crossref |
||||
Tiwari, S. P., Gendley, M. K., Pathak, A. K., & Gupta, R. (2010). Influence of an enzyme cocktail and phytase individually or in combination in Ven Cobb broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 51(1), 92-100. Crossref |
||||
Viveros, A., Chamorro, S., Pizarro, M., Arija, I., Centeno, C., & Brenes, A. (2011). Effects of dietary polyphenol-rich grape products on intestinal microflora and gut morphology in broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 90(3), 566-578. Crossref |
||||
Willis, W. L., & Reid, L. (2008). Investigating the effects of dietary probiotic feeding regimens on broiler chicken production and Campylobacter jejuni presence. Poultry Science, 87(4), 606-611. Crossref |