JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Integrity Research Journals

ISSN: 2536-7072
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASP
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasp@integrityresjournals.org


Quantifying farmers' preferred agronomic traits and participatory bread wheat variety selection

https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2019.131   |   Article Number: B00053F04   |   Vol.4 (2) - April 2019

Received Date: 26 February 2019   |   Accepted Date: 16 April 2019  |   Published Date: 30 April 2019

Authors:  AREGA Gashaw* , AKALU Gebru and AGEGNEHU Mekonnen

Keywords: Bread wheat, farmers participatory, variety selection.

Farmers participatory bread wheat variety selection (PVS) was carried-out at major wheat producing areas of South Wollo, Ethiopia in the 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons. Fifteen recently released bread wheat varieties along with local variety were evaluated for yield and yield-related traits, with the objective of quantifying farmers' preferred agronomic traits and to associate farmers' qualitative selection with conventional breeding evaluation technique. The experiment was laid-out in Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) replicated three times, where farmer's field was used as a replication. Prior to evaluating the performance of the tested bread wheat varieties, progressive farmers listed-down and weighed the major farmers' preferred agronomic traits for bread wheat breeding and selection. Accordingly, they identified eight major quantitative and qualitative traits; categorized as cold tolerance, disease tolerance, earliness, kernel color, spike length, spike density, tillering potential and kernel boldness. Cold tolerance, disease tolerance and earliness were identified the major traits that predominantly determines wheat productivity and received 22%, 16% and 13% of farmers’ selection criteria, respectively. Kernel color affects consumers' and market preferences, where white kernelled wheat grains fetch good market price. Thus, kernel color received 13% of farmers’ selection index. On the other hand, spike length, spike density, tillering potential and kernel boldness received 11, 9, 10 and 6% of the farmers' selection index, respectively. Bearing the set traits in mind, farmers evaluated the tested bread wheat varieties at maturity stage. Based on their overall evaluation, farmers preferred Danda'a, Ogolcho and King-bird at Legambo, Wogdie and Borena districts. On the other hand, Hidase was selected at Kelela district out-yielding the rest of the tested varieties. Breeders’ quantitative analysis also confirmed results of farmers' qualitative selection, justifying the presence of farmers' untapped breeding and selection experiences that could be utilized in modern conventional breeding program. Therefore, breeders should involve farmers as main partners in crop breeding and selection program and augment conventional breeding skills with traditional farmers’ knowledge.

Abebe, G., Assefa, T., Harrun, H., & Mesfine, T. (2005). Participatory selection of drought tolerant maize varieties using mother and baby methodology: A case study in the semi arid zones of the central rift valley of Ethiopia. In African Crop Science Conference Proceedings (Vol. 7, pp. 1479-1485).
 
Basavaraj, G., Parthasarathy Rao, P., Achoth, L., Pokharkar, V. G., Gupta, S. K., & Ashok Kumar, A. (2015). Understanding Trait Preferences of Farmers for Post-Rainy Sorghum and Pearl Millet in India-A Conjoint Analysis. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1), 130-143.
 
Belay, G., Tefera, H., Tadesse, B., Metaferia, G., Jarra, D., & Tadesse, T. (2006). Participatory variety selection in the Ethiopian cereal tef (Eragrostis tef). Experimental Agriculture, 42(1), 91-101.
Crossref
 
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Singh, M., Michael, M., Shikho, A., Al Issa, M., Al Saleh, A., Kaleonjy, G., Al Ghanem, S. M., Al Hasan, A. L., & Dalla, H. (2003). A methodological study on participatory barley breeding II. Response to selection. Euphytica, 133(2), 185-200.
Crossref
 
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Tutwiler, R., Baha, J., Martini, A. M., Salahieh, H., Goodchild, A., & Michael, M. (2000). A methodological study on participatory barley breeding I. Selection phase. Euphytica, 111(2), 91-104.
Crossref
 
Central Statistical Agency (CSA) (2016). Agricultural sample survey, Volume I. Report on area and production of major crops.
 
Chambers, R. (2005). Rural appraisal: rapid, relaxed, participatory: Vikas publishing house.
 
Chimdesa, O., Aseffa, K., & Alemu, S. (2018). Participatory Variety Selection of Improved Bread Wheat Varieties for Moisture Stress Areas of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry, 5(4), 1-6.
 
Gashaw, A., Mohammed, H., & Singh, H. (2007). Genetic divergence in selected durum wheat genotypes of Ethiopian germplasm. African Crop Science Journal, 15(2), 67-72.
Crossref
 
Gashaw, A., Mohammed, H., & Singh, H. (2010). Genotypic variability, heritability, genetic advance and associations among characters in Ethiopian durum wheat (Triticum durum desf.) accessions. East African Journal of Sciences, 4(1), 27-33.
Crossref
 
Iqbal, M., Navabi, A., Salmon, D., Yang, R. C., & Spaner, D. (2006). A genetic examination of early flowering and maturity in Canadian spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86(4), 995-1004.
Crossref
 
Mancini, C., Kidane, Y. G., Mengistu, D. K., Pè, M. E., Fadda, C., & Dell'Acqua, M. (2017). Joining smallholder farmers' traditional knowledge with metric traits to select better varieties of Ethiopian wheat. Scientific reports, 7(9120), 11p.
Crossref
 
Mustafa, Y., Grando, S., & Ceccarelli, S. (2006). Assessing the benefits and costs of participatory and conventional barley breeding programs in Syria. ICARDA report for a study supported by the International Development Research Centre. Pp. 1-54.
 
Namara, R. & Manig, W. (2000). Participatory bread wheat breeding in Ethiopia: A socio-economic assessment. Deutscher Tropentag, Pp. 1-15.
 
Nkongolo, K., Chinthu, K., Malusi, M., & Vokhiwa, Z. (2008). Participatory variety selection and characterization of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) elite accessions from Malawian gene pool using farmer and breeder knowledge. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(4), 273-283.
 
Orawu, M., Obuo, P., & Omadi, R. (2013). Participatory variety selection to enhance cowpea variety development and selection in northern region of Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(1), 57-73.
 
Pandit, D., Islam, M., Harun-ur-Rashid, M., & Sufian, M. (2007). Participatory variety selection in wheat and its impact on scaling-up seed dissemination and varietal diversity. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research, 32(3), 473-486.
Crossref
 
Paulsen, G. M., Heyne, E. G., & Wilkins, H. D. (1982). Spring freeze injury to Kansas wheat (No. 83-922105. CIMMYT).
 
Seifu, E., Mekibib, F., & Dessalegn, T. (2018). Performance and farmers selection criteria Evaluation of Improved Bread Wheat Varieties. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(44), 2477-2498.
Crossref
 
Singh, Y. P., Nayak, A. K., Sharma, D. K., Gautam, R. K., Singh, R. K., Singh, R., Mishra, V.K., Paris, T., & Ismail, A. M. (2014). Farmers' participatory varietal selection: A sustainable crop improvement approach for the 21st century. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 38(4), 427-444.
Crossref
 
Sperling, L., Loevinsohn, M., & Ntabomvura, B. (1993). Rethinking the farmer's role in plant breeding: Local bean experts and on-station selection in Rwanda. Experimental Agriculture, 29(4), 509-519.
Crossref
 
Vom Brocke, K., Trouche, G., Weltzien, E., Barro-Kondombo, C. P., Gozé, E., & Chantereau, J. (2010). Participatory variety development for sorghum in Burkina Faso: Farmers' selection and farmers' criteria. Field Crops Research, 119(1), 183-194.
Crossref
 
Witcombe, J. R., Joshi, A., Joshi, K. D., & Sthapit, B. (996). Farmer participatory crop improvement. I. Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Experimental Agriculture, 32(4), 445-460.
Crossref
 
Witcombe, J., & Virk, D. 1997. New directions for public sector variety testing. New Seed and Old Laws. Regulatory reform and the diversification of national seed systems.(Tripp R ed.). London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications. Pp. 59-87.
Crossref