ISSN: 2811-2407
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/IJAH
Start Year: 2020
Email: ijah@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/IJAH2021.034 | Article Number: D8A7399F4 | Vol.2 (3) - October 2021
Received Date: 10 September 2021 | Accepted Date: 06 October 2021 | Published Date: 30 October 2021
Authors: OYEDEJI Gideon Abioye* and IDRIS Nabila Idoko
Keywords: Critical discourse analysis, ideologies, South Africa, xenophobic attacks.
The incessant xenophobic attacks of Nigerians and other foreign nationals in South Africa have generated a unique discourse in the Nigerian media and in fact, other mainstream media on the African continent and international scene. These attacks are viewed by the international community as incompatible with 21st century civility. This paper therefore, engages the reports of selected news media in Nigeria, South African and other media houses with a view to explicating the ideologies that underpin each report seeing through the insight of Van Dijk, Norman Fairclough and Ruth Wodak’s models of Critical Discourse Analysis. A total of 10 report on the 2015-2019 xenophobia were purposively selected from the online outlets of these media houses. The study therefore found that the use of language by the Nigerian media shows that the polarisation tilted towards emphasising the positive ‘in-group’ description of the heinous acts visited on innocent Nigerians in South Africa whereas the South African and other news media brought to perspective the negative ‘out-group’ description of “some” Nigerians who are engaged in illegal businesses in their South Africa. The lexical choices contribute in significant ways to show the ideologies each reporters represent. The study submits that, these attacks by South Africans on fellow African Nationals are nefarious, iniquitous, atrocious and roguish perhaps because of their colonial experience.
Anyim, B. A. Chijioke, N., & Anyim-Ben, F. (2019). Nigeria, Nigerians and xenophobic attacks; political and economic implications: A phenomenological approach. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 2(2), 22- 29. | ||||
Babalola, T. E. (2002). Newspaper as instruments for building literate communities: The Nigerian experience. Nordic Journal of African Studies 11(3), 403-410. | ||||
Bello, I., & Tunde, S. R. (2017). The implication of xenophobic violence on Nigeria-South Africa relations. Journal of International Studies. 13, 117-125. Crossref |
||||
Fairclough, N. (1999). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman. | ||||
Gamson, W. A. C., & Modiglian, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionists approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37. Crossref |
||||
Harris, B. (2001). A foreign experience: Violence, crime and xenophobia during South Africa's transition, CSUR. | ||||
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd Edition). Edward Arnold. | ||||
Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as ideology. Routledge. | ||||
Iyangar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? University of Chicago Press. Crossref |
||||
Mogokwu, M. (2005). African union: Xenophobia as poor intercultural information. Ecquid Novi 26 (1), 5-20. Crossref |
||||
Ogungbe (2012). Pragmatic acts in the news reports of some Nigerian newspapers. A PhD Thesis. University Of Ibadan. | ||||
Ogunnowo, O., & Joshua, S. (2019). Xenophobic attacks in South Africa and Nigeria's foreign policy: Rethinking Nigeria's afro-centric foreign policy posture. Covenant University Journal of Politics and International Affair. 7(1), 1-16. | ||||
Oyedeji, G. A. (2020). An exploration of Pius Adesanmi column articles: A pragmatic stylistic approach. Lambert Academic Publishing. | ||||
Peterside, S. K., Ibietan, J., & Deinde-Adedeji, O. (2020). Xenophobia and migrants' irritants in Nigeria-South Africa Relations: A discourse. International Journal of Innovative Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(4), 48-60. | ||||
Solomon, H., & Kosaka, H. (2013). Xenophobia in South Africa: Reflections, narratives and recommendations. South African Peace and Security Studies, 2(2), 5-30. | ||||
Sotonye, B., & Tamunopubo, B. (2020). Xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa: Ethical implications, and responses of the Nigerian government. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development. 7(2), 36-41. | ||||
Taiwo, R. (2009). Legitimization and coercion in political discourse: A case study of Olusegun Obasanjo address to the PDP elders and stakeholders forum. Journal of Political Discourse Analysis. 2(2), 192-204. | ||||
UNESCO (2017). International technical guidance on sexuality education: An evidence-informed approach. UNESCO. | ||||
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. Crossref |
||||
Van Dijk, T. A (1998). Ideology. A multidisciplinary study. Sage | ||||
Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In Caldas-Couthard, C. R., & Coulthard, M. (eds.). Readings in critical discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 32-70. | ||||
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: Wodak, R., & | ||||
Meyer, M. (eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage. Pp. 1-13. | ||||
Wodak, R. (2009). Critical discourse analysis. In: Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F., & Silverman, D.(eds.). Qualitative research practice (pp. 197-213). Sage. |