ISSN: 2811-2407
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/IJAH
Start Year: 2020
Email: ijah@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/IJAH2022.060 | Article Number: 30400F141 | Vol.4 (1) - February 2023
Received Date: 19 June 2022 | Accepted Date: 11 August 2022 | Published Date: 28 February 2023
Authors: Franca S. Jando* wantorshimmy@gmail.com and Thomas Terkura Mchia
Keywords: gospel, theology., Christian, God, preachers, prosperity, Sophists
The Ancient Greek Sophists occupy a very important and a unique period in Western civilization, scholars are not certain if they should be considered as philosophers. This is largely due to their mode of operation. They were considered as corrupt people who made their way out of every opportunity at the detriment of others. Christianity in the 21st Century has taken a new dimension in several churches around the world; many contemporary preachers of the gospel have mastered the acts of preaching to convince their gullible followers into trusting and believing their teachings. On a daily basis people are falling prey to corrupt and unrealistic doctrines such as prosperity and healing. This has become easily possible because people, mostly Africans are going through very many difficult situations, they have grown ardent desires to better their lives, and perhaps prosperity gospel seems to be glaring opportunity to achieve such desires. Prosperity theology is commonly a part of the televangelist, Charismatic, and Pentecostal churches. Prosperity theology makes the claim that God wants Christians to be abundantly successful in every way including financially. This study seeks to draw a comparative study of the ancient Greek Sophists with our contemporary preachers, which many seem to be masters of all like the sophists. The study employs historical and analytic methods of research. The study concludes that people will always be deceived and manipulated by their desires or longings.
Mohler, A. (2009). It promises far too little the false gospel of prosperity theology. Albert Mohler. Link |
||||
Kenny, A. (2004). A New History of Western Philosophy. Clarendon Press Oxford. | ||||
Baer, J. (2002). The soil of the prosperity gospel is the bitter harvest of an ancient seed planted in modern soil. In: Leeman, J. (ed). Biblical Teaching for Building Healthy Churches. Washington D.C: 9Marks Books. | ||||
Bowens, B. J. (2012). Prosperity gospel and its effect on the 21st century church, USA: Xlibris Corporation. | ||||
Mbewe C. (2012). Our criminal evangelical silence. Link |
||||
Hinn, C. (2019). God, greed, and the prosperity gospel. USA: Michigan Zondervan Press. | ||||
Jones D. W. (2002). Errors of the prosperity gospel. In: Leeman, J. (ed). Biblical teaching for building healthy churches. Washington D.C: 9Marks Books. | ||||
Gagarin, M. (2002). Antiphon the Athenian oratory, law, and justice in the age of the sophists. USA: University of Texas Press. Crossref |
||||
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1977). The sophists. London: Cambridge University Press. Crossref |
||||
Dresser, H. W. (1988). The Quimby manuscripts: Showing the discovery of spiritual healing and the origin of Christian Science. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell. | ||||
Haller, Jr, J. S. (2012). Foreword by Robert C. Fuller. The history of New Thought from mind cure to positive thinking and the prosperity gospel. USA: Swedenborg Foundation Press. | ||||
Kerferd, G. B. (1981) The sophistic movement. London: Cambridge University Press. | ||||
Núñez, M. (2002). Why Has the Prosperity Gospel Prospered? In: Leeman, J. (ed). Biblical teaching for building healthy churches. Washington D.C: 9Marks Books. | ||||
Ravi, Z. (2000). An ancient message, through modern means to a postmodern mind. In: Carson, D. A. (ed.). Telling the truth. USA: Grand Rapids: Zondervan. | ||||
DeMars, S. (2002). A "Gospel" that almost killed me. In: Leeman, J. (ed). Biblical teaching for building healthy churches. Washington D.C: 9Marks Books. | ||||
Whedbee, K. (2008). Making the worse case appear the better: British reception of the Greek sophists prior to 1850. Rhetoric & public affairs. |