ISSN: 2636-6002
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/GJEES
Start Year: 2016
Email: gjees@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/GJEES2019.031 | Article Number: CA8D18F72 | Vol.4 (4) - August 2019
Received Date: 22 February 2019 | Accepted Date: 29 March 2019 | Published Date: 30 August 2019
Authors: Daniel Eshimiakhe* , Raimi Jimoh and Zainab Musa
Keywords: lithology, Electrical resistivity, seismic velocity, test site, tomography.
Due to the advancement in technology being applied in geophysics, it is of importance that a geophysical test site center is established for calibration, training, and demonstration of such equipment. An integrated geophysical survey of the area has been conducted, with the aim of characterizing the subsurface structures and lithology. Thereafter, different types of objects that respond to all geophysical techniques will be buried at different depths in the site. Seismic refraction and electrical resistivity tomography were used, using the seistronix RAS 24 seismograph and SAS 4000 ABEM Terameter equipment. These two survey methods were adopted due to the pictorial image they give of the subsurface, enabling a clear view of subsurface structures. A total of five profiles were taken at a total length of 300 m and an inter-profile spacing of 45 m. The results of this survey in correlation with borehole data revealed three distinct layers; overburden, weathered and fresh basement. The overburden consists of the topsoil and lateritic clay, averaging a depth of 3 to 6 m and having a seismic velocity of 100 to 700 m/s and resistivity range of 370 to 750 Ωm. Underneath the overburden is the weathered basement, consisting of brownish fine to medium grained coarse sand, gravel and some disintegrated schistose material, averaging a depth of 6 to 30 m and having a seismic velocity of 700 to 2100 m/s and resistivity range of 56 to 370 Ωm. The depth to the third layer (fresh basement) suggested less compact subsurface of depth >45 m. A close examination of the velocities with depth shows higher velocities at deeper depths (2100 to 3200 m/s) and resistivity > 1500 Ωm.
Aizebeokhai, A. P. (2010). 2d and 3d geoelectrical resistivity imaging: theory and field design. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(23), 3592-3605. | ||||
Azwin, I. N., Saad, R., & Nordiana, M. (2013). Applying the seismic refraction tomography for site characterization. APCBEE Procedia, 5, 227-231. Crossref |
||||
Baker, H. A., Djeddi, M., Boudjadja, A. C., Benhaman, K. (2001). A different approach in delineating near surface buried structures, in Proc. of the 63rd European Association of Exploration Geophysicists, 1, Amsterdam, M-17. | ||||
Benson, R. C., & Yuhr, L. (2002). Site characterization strategies: old and new. In Second Annual Conference on the Application of Geophysical and NDT Methodologies to Transportation Facilities, Federal Highway Administration, April, Pp. 15-19. | ||||
Benson, R., Glaccum, R. A., & Noel, M. R. (1984). Geophysical Techniques for Sensing Buried Wastes and Waste Migration. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of Research and Development. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Las Vegas, Nevada. | ||||
Coskun, N. (2012). The effectiveness of electrical resistivity imaging in sinkhole investigations. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 7(15), 2398-2405. Crossref |
||||
Dey, A., & Morrison, H. F. (1979). Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped three-dimensional structures. Geophysics, 44(4), 753-780. Crossref |
||||
Dogan, M., & Papamarinopoulos, S. (2003). Geoelectric prospection of a city wall by multi‐electrode resistivity image survey at the prehistoric site of Asea (southern Greece). Archaeological Prospection, 10(4), 241-248. Crossref |
||||
Dutta, N. P (1984). Seismic refraction method to study the foundation rock of a dam. Geophysical Prospecting, 32(6),1103-1110. Crossref |
||||
Gaffney, V., Patterson, H., Piro, S., Goodman, D., & Nishimura, Y. (2004). Multimethodological approach to study and characterize Forum Novum (Vescovio, central Italy). Archaeological Prospection, 11(4), 201-212. Crossref |
||||
Goldstein, N. E. (1994). Expedited site characterization geophysics: geophysical methods and tools for site characterization. Crossref |
||||
Grant, N. K. (1969). The late Precambrian to early Paleozoic Pan-African orogeny in Ghana, Togo, Dahomey, and Nigeria. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 80(1), 45-56. Crossref |
||||
Kilty, K. T., Norris, R. A., McLamore, W. R., Hennon, K. P., & Euge, K. (1986). Seismic refraction at horse mesa dam: An application of the generalized reciprocal method. Geophysics, 51(2), 266-275. Crossref |
||||
Lascano, E., Osella, A., De La Vega, M., Buscaglia, S., Senatore, X., & Lanata, J. L. (2003). Geophysical prospection at Floridablanca archaeological site, San Julian Bay, Argentina. Archaeological Prospection, 10(3), 175-192. Crossref |
||||
Leucci, G. (2004). I metodi elettromagnetico impulsivo, elettrico e sismico tomografico a rifrazione per la risoluzione di problematiche ambientali: sviluppi metodologici e applicazioni.PhD tesi in Geophysics for Environmental and Territory, University of Messina. | ||||
Loke, M. (2000). Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies: A Practical Guide to 2D & 3D Electrical Imaging Surveys. Technical Reports. | ||||
Loke, M. H., & Barker R. D (1996). Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections using a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting, 44(1), 131-152. Crossref |
||||
McCurry, P. (1970). The Geology of the Zaria sheet 102 S.W. and its Region. Mortimore, M.J. (Ed.). Department of Geography Occasional Paper No. 4, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. p. 7. | ||||
Murdie, R. E., Goulty, N. R., White, R. H., Barratt, G., Cassidy, N. J., & Gaffney, V. (2003). Comparison of geophysical techniques for investigating an infilled ditch at Bury Walls hill fort, Shropshire. Archaeological Prospection,10(4), 265-276. Crossref |
||||
Ojo, F. O., Ademilua, O. L., & Osazuwa, I. B. (2013). Two-dimensional electrical imaging of the subsurface structure of Bomo dam Zaria, Kaduna State north central Nigeria. Transnational Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 89-102. | ||||
Oyawoye, M. O. (1964). The geology of the Nigerian basement complex. Journal of Mining and Geology, 1(1), 87-102. | ||||
Parasnis, D. E. (1997). Principles of Applied Geophysics, fifth ed., Chapman and Hall, London. | ||||
Sandmeier, J. K. (2008). Windows ˇDc 9x/NT/2000/XP-program for the processing of seismic, acoustic or electromagnetic reflection, refraction, and transmission data. | ||||
Silvester, P. P., & Ferrari, R. L. (1996). Finite elements for electrical engineers. Cambridge university press. Crossref |
||||
Sjøgren, B., Øfsthus, A., & Sandberg, J. (1979). Seismic classification of rock mass qualities. Geophysical Prospecting, 27(2), 409-442. Crossref |
||||
Tokarski, A. (1972). Heterogeneous Terrace Arrangement West of Ahmadu Bello University. Occasional paper, No. 1, Department of Geology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. p. 6. | ||||
Wright, J. B., & McCury, P. (1970). The geology of Nigeria Sheet 102 SW, Zaria and its regions. Mortimore, M. J. (ed.). Department of Geography, Occasional Paper, No. 4, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. | ||||
Yilmaz, S. (2011). A case study of the application of electrical resistivity imaging for investigation of a landslide along highway. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 6(24), 5843-5849. |