ISSN: 2971-673X
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JEIA
Start Year: 2018
Email: jeia@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JEIA2022.023 | Article Number: 944D17A12 | Vol.1 (2) - August 2022
Received Date: 05 August 2022 | Accepted Date: 28 August 2022 | Published Date: 30 August 2022
Authors: Edafiadhe, E. D. and Nwanze N. E.*
Keywords: mechanical properties, Environmental pollution, organic fibres, soil treatment, synthetic fibres.
Bio-composites have been widely introduced as sustainable alternative engineering materials, due to their environmental friendliness. The aim of this study was to assess the variations in the mechanical and biodegradation behaviours of natural fibres (raffia palm and plantain fibres) reinforced composites, and compared them to artificial fibres composites. Bio-composite samples produced through hybridization of glass fibre, plantain fibre and raffia palm fibre, were tested (mechanical and biodegradability tests) in accordance with ASTM International accepted procedures. The biodegradability results indicated that, the tensile strength and tensile elongation for all composites decreased non-linearly during the 28 days of soil treatment. Also, it was observed that the mechanical properties of the natural fibres reinforced bio-composites declined faster, when compared to the synthetic fibre reinforced composite. The bio-composite produced solely with natural fibres (PFRF) had the highest tensile strength reduction rate (43.86%), while the composite produced with solely synthetic fibre (glass fibre) had the minimum tensile strength declining rate (2.18%), at the end of the soil treatment. Regarding the tensile elongation, the PFRF bio-composite had the highest decrement (89.98%), when compared to the 53.28 and 45.92% recorded in the CFPF and CFRF reinforced bio-composites, respectively. With respect to weight loss, it was observed that the weight loss was gradual during the initial period of the soil treatment. However, the bio-composite with the two natural fibres (PFRF) exhibited more pronounced weight loss (46.4%); while the sample with the synthesized fibre (CF) exhibited more resistance to biodegradation (6.23% weight loss). The study results demonstrated that plantain fibre and raffia fibre are environmentally friendly, and composites produced from them developed appreciable tensile properties; hence, they can be used to produce composite for automobile parts.
Agbi, G. G., & Uguru, H. (2021). Assessing the impact of cassava starch on the structural properties of sandcete blocks produced from recycled paper. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(5), 99-103. | ||||
Akpokodje, O. I, Uguru, H., & Esegbuyota, D. (2019). Study of flexural strength and flexural modulus of reinforced concrete beams with raffia palm fibres. World Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology, 3(1), 57-64. | ||||
ASTM G160-03 (2003). Standard practice for evaluating microbial susceptibility of nonmetallic materials by laboratory soil burial. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. | ||||
Bayode, A., Isiaka, O., & Abosede, O. (2017). Characterization of snail shell reinforced polyester composites. International Journal of Research and Engineering, 4(9), 236-240. | ||||
Edafeadhe, G. O. I., Agbi, G. G., & Uguru, H. (2020). Effect of calcium nitrate application on the structural behavour of okra (cv. Kirikou) fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Journal of Engineering and Information Technology, 7(2), 69-74. | ||||
Edafiadhe, E. O., Nyorere, O., & Uguru, H. (2019). Compressive behaviours of oil bean shell and wood particulates/ epoxy composite board. Archives of Current Research International, 16(3), 1-8, Crossref |
||||
Esegbuyota, D., Akpokodje, O. I., & Uguru, H. (2019). Physical characteristics and compressive strength of raffia fibre reinforced sandcrete blocks. Direct Research Journal of Engineering and Information Technology, 6(1), 1-8. | ||||
Farag, M. M. (2017). Design and manufacture of biodegradable products from renewable resources. In: Handbook of composites from renewable materials; Scrivener Publishing-Wiley. Crossref |
||||
Fogorasi, M., & Barbu, I. (2017). The potential of natural fibres for automotive sector-Review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 252, 012044. Crossref |
||||
Fortunati, E., Puglia, D., Monti, M., Santulli, C., Maniruzzaman, M., & Kenny, J. M. (2013). Cellulose nanocrystals extracted from okra fibers in PVA nanocomposites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 128(5), 3220-3230. Crossref |
||||
Guleria, A., Singha, A. S., & Rana, R. K. (2018). Mechanical, thermal, morphological, and biodegradable studies of okra cellulosic fiber reinforced starch‐based biocomposites. Advances in polymer technology, 37(1), 104-112. Crossref |
||||
Huang, Z., Qian, L., Yin, Q., Yu, N., Liu, T., & Tian, D. (2018). Biodegradability studies of poly (butylene succinate) composites filled with sugarcane rind fiber. Polymer Testing, 66, 319-326. Crossref |
||||
Ibrahim, H., Mehanny, S., Darwish, L., & Farag, M. (2018). A comparative study on the mechanical and biodegradation characteristics of starch-based composites reinforced with different lignocellulosic fibers. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 26(6), 2434-2447. Crossref |
||||
Kandpal, B.C. Chaurasia, R. & Khurana, V. (2015). Recent advances in green composites - A Review. International Journal for Technological Research in Engineering, 2(7), 742-747 | ||||
Koushal, V., Sharma, R., Sharma, M., Sharma, R., & Sharma, V. (2014). Plastics: issues challenges and remediation. International Journal of Waste Resources, 4(1), 134. | ||||
Luo, S., & Netravali, A. N. (2003). A study of physical and mechanical properties of poly (hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) during composting. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 80(1), 59-66. Crossref |
||||
Mir, S. S., Hasan, S. M., Hossain, M. J., & Hasan, M. (2012). Chemical modification effect on the mechanical properties of coir fiber. Engineering Journal, 16(2), 73-84. Crossref |
||||
Myshkin, N., & Kovalev, A. (2018). Adhesion and surface forces in polymer tribology-A review. Friction, 6(2), 143-155. Crossref |
||||
Obukoeroro, J., & Uguru, H. E. (2021). Evaluation of the mechanical and electrical properties of carbon black/carbonized snail shell powder hybridized conductive epoxy composite. International Journal of Innovative Scientific & Engineering Technologies Research, 9(1), 39-49. | ||||
Oghenerukewve, P. O., & Uguru, H. (2018). Effect of fillers loading on the mechanical properties of hardwood sawdust/oil bean shell reinforced epoxy hybrid composites. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(8), 620-626. | ||||
Phua, Y. J., Chow, W. S., & Ishak, Z. M. (2011). The hydrolytic effect of moisture and hygrothermal aging on poly (butylene succinate)/organo-montmorillonite nanocomposites. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 96(7), 1194-1203. Crossref |
||||
Phua, Y. J., Lau, N. S., Sudesh, K., Chow, W. S., & Ishak, Z. M. (2012). Biodegradability studies of poly (butylene succinate)/organo-montmorillonite nanocomposites under controlled compost soil conditions: effects of clay loading and compatibiliser. Polymer degradation and stability, 97(8), 1345-1354. Crossref |
||||
Puglia, D., Biagiotti, J., & Kenny, J. M. (2005). A review on natural fibre-based composites-Part II: Application of natural reinforcements in composite materials for automotive industry. Journal of Natural Fibers, 1(3), 23-65. Crossref |
||||
Raju, G. U., & Kumarappa, S. (2011). Experimental study on mechanical properties of groundnut shell particle-reinforced epoxy composites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 30(12), 1029-1037. Crossref |
||||
Reddy, M. M., Vivekanandhan, S., Misra, M., Bhatia, S. K., Mohanty, A. K. (2013). Biobased plastics and bionanocomposites: Current status and future opportunities. Progress in Polymer Science, 38(10-11), 1653-1689. Crossref |
||||
Sapuan, S. M., Lok, H. Y., Ishak, M. R., & Misri, S. (2013). Mechanical properties of hybrid glass/sugar palm fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science, 31(10), 1394-1403. Crossref |
||||
Sudesh, K., & Iwata, T. (2008). Sustainability of biobased and biodegradable plastics. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water, 36(5‐6), 433-442. Crossref |
||||
Surata, I. W., Suriadi, I. G., & Arnis, K. (2014). Mechanical properties of rice husks fiber reinforced polyester composite. International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, 2(2), 165-168. Crossref |
||||
Thellen, C., Orroth, C., Froio, D., Ziegler, D., Lucciarini, J., Farrell, R., D'Souza, N. A., & Ratto, J. A. (2005). Influence of montmorillonite layered silicate on plasticized poly (l-lactide) blown films. Polymer, 46(25), 11716-11727. Crossref |
||||
Tsuji, H., & Suzuyoshi, K. (2002). Environmental degradation of biodegradable polyesters 1. Poly (ε-caprolactone), poly [(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate], and poly (L-lactide) films in controlled static seawater. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 75(2), 347-355. Crossref |
||||
Uguru, H. & Oghenerukevwe, P. (2021). Effect of organic fillers on the tensile characterization of calcium carbonate hybridized epoxy composite. Direct Research Journal of Engineering and Information Technology, 8, 42-48. Crossref |
||||
Uguru, H., & Obah, G. E. (2020). Tensile characterization of pre-harvest treated pineapple leaf fibre. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 18(4), 51-58. Crossref |
||||
Uguru, H., & Uyeri, C. (2018). Effect of vine section on the tensile properties of fluted pumpkin vine. Direct Research Journal of Engineering and Information Technology. 5(5), 10-16 | ||||
Umurhurhu, B., & Uguru, H. (2019). Tensile behaviour of oil bean pod shell and mahogany sawdust reinforced epoxy resin composite. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society. 7(1), 1-7. Crossref |
||||
Vroman, I., & Tighzert, L. (2009). Biodegradable polymers. Materials, 2(2), 307-344. Crossref |
||||
Zah, R., Hischier, R., Leão, A. L., & Braun, I. (2007). Curauá fibers in the automobile industry - A sustainability assessment. Journal of cleaner production, 15(11-12), 1032-1040. Crossref |