ISSN: 2536-7072
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASP
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasp@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2023.450 | Article Number: ECBE05612 | Vol.9 (2) - April 2024
Received Date: 11 November 2023 | Accepted Date: 06 February 2024 | Published Date: 30 April 2024
Authors: O. M. Ogah* , B. Benjamin and O. D. Josiah
Keywords: determinants, Farmers, exchange labour, participation, probit.
The study examined the determinants of exchange labour participation in Olamaboro Local Government Area of Kogi State, Nigeria. A purposive and simple random sampling of the respondents was used with descriptive statistics such as frequency distribution, tables, percentages, mean and probit models as tools of analysis. Data for the study was collected from primary sources through the use of a well-structured questionnaire to elicit information from the respondents. The results on socio-economic characteristics revealed that the mean age of participants in exchange labour was 34 years and mostly males (60.83%). Most were of active age, married and mean household size of 4 persons, they had one form of education or the other (89.17%). They were small-scale farmers with a mean farm size of 2 hectares and mean exchange labour farming experience of 6 years. Access to extension contact is low and the farmers have an annual farm income of N137,837.5. The results of the probit model analysis revealed that access to credit and marital status were the significant variables that influence the probability of participation in exchange labour. These have coefficients that were significant at 5 and 10% level of probability respectively. The study concludes that exchange labour could be a means of increasing the probability of labour through adequate credit. It was recommended that exchange labour group members should create awareness to rural farmers for more membership, government support in the form of credit to boost production and farm income is important.
Agarwal, B. (2018). Can group farms outperform individual family farms? Empirical insights from India. World Development, 108, 57-73. Crossref |
||||
Akpan, S., Nkanta, V. S., & Edet, Udoh, E. (2023). Farm labour preferences among small-scale arable crop farmers in Akwa Ibom State, Southern Nigeria. Muş Alparslan University Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 3(2), 77-90. Crossref |
||||
Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2014). The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82-92. Crossref |
||||
Bello, A. R. S. (2014). Agriculture communal labor in the Nuba mountains. Journal of Research in Peace, Gender and Development, 4(3), 48-54. | ||||
Borjas, G. J., (2015). Labor economics (Seventh edition). McGraw Hill, New York 592p. | ||||
Edoka, M. H. (2015). Assessment of farm labour group among Igala and Ebira ethnic groups in Kogi State, Nigeria. Doctoral thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. 154p. | ||||
Edoka, M. H., Igbokwe, E. M., & Adejo, P. E. (2014). Constraints to farmers' labour group productivity in Eastern Kogi State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 18(2), 68-75. Crossref |
||||
Gbemisola, O., & Kevin, M. (2014). Report No.: 78364-NG Nigeria Agriculture and Rural Poverty. A Policy Note. | ||||
Ibitoye, S. J., & Saliu, O. J. (2019). An Evaluation of the Performance of Nigeria Agricultural Insurance Scheme in Kogi State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, 33(2), 1-9. Crossref |
||||
Jayne, T. vS., Chamberlin, J., Traub, L., Sitko, N., Muyanga, M., Yeboah, F. K., Anseeuw, W., Chapoto, A., Wineman, A., Nkonde, C., & Kachule, R. (2016). Africa's changing farm size distribution patterns: the rise of medium‐scale farms. Agricultural Economics, 47(S1), 197-214. Crossref |
||||
Kendra, C. (2021). The social exchange theory in relationships. Medically reviewed by Amy Morin, LCSW. | ||||
Kughur, G. P., Anonguku, İ., & Okodo, C. C. (2019). Analysis of Local and Improved Chickens Consumption in Olamaboro Local Government Area of Kogi State, Nigeria. Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences, 4(2), 127-133. Crossref |
||||
Loison, S. A. (2015). Rural livelihood diversification in sub-Saharan Africa: a literature review. The Journal of Development Studies, 51(9), 1125-1138. Crossref |
||||
Lowder, S. K., Skoet, J., & Raney, T. (2016). The number, size, and distribution of farms, smallholder farms, and family farms worldwide. World Development, 87, 16-29. Crossref |
||||
Martin, S. M., & Lorenzen, K. A. I. (2016). Livelihood diversification in rural Laos. World Development, 83, 231-243. Crossref |
||||
Oluwatusin, F., & Shittu, G. (2014). Effect of socio-economic characteristics on the farm productivity performance of yam farmers in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 31-37. | ||||
Osabohien, R., Wiredu, A. N., Nguezet, P. M. D., Mignouna, D. B., Abdoulaye, T., Manyong, V., Bamba, Z., & Awotide, B. A. (2021). Youth participation in agriculture and poverty reduction in Nigeria. Sustainability, 13(14), 7795. Crossref |
||||
Oyinbo, O., & Olaleye, K. T. (2016). Farm Households Livelihood Diversification and Poverty Alleviation in Giwa Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Consilience, 15, 219-232. | ||||
Phillip, D., Nkonya, E., Pender, J., & Omobowale, A. O. (2019). Constraints to Increasing Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria: A Review. Background Paper No. NSSP 006 for the Nigeria Strategy Support Program (NSSP). | ||||
Redmond, M. V. (2015). Social exchange theory (p. 36). English Technical Reports and White Papers. Iowa State University. Link |
||||
Silva, J. V., Baudron, F., Reidsma, P., & Giller, K. E. (2019). Is labour a major determinant of yield gaps in sub-Saharan Africa? A study of cereal-based production systems in Southern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems, 174, 39-51. Crossref |
||||
Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development (SARD) (2021). SARD and farmers' organization. SARD Policy Brief 12, 2021. | ||||
World Bank (2017). Growing the rural non-farm economy to alleviate poverty: An evaluation of the contribution of the World Bank Group. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. |