ISSN: 2536-7072
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASP
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasp@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2021.314 | Article Number: 94D3FF041 | Vol.6 (6) - December 2021
Received Date: 10 October 2021 | Accepted Date: 30 October 2021 | Published Date: 30 December 2021
Authors: E. E. Okoli* , E.N. Ngonadi and M.C. Nwagbala
Keywords: cocoyam, planting dates, cultivar, corm yield, growth attributes
The experiment was conducted in 2019 at the Teaching and Research Farm of Department of Crop Science and Horticulture, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Igbariam Anambra State. The aim was to establish the best planting date for cocoyam cultivars. The experiment consisted of three cultivars (Ede nkiti, Akili Nssuka and Ede oyibo) as main factor while planting dates (28th June, 28th July and 28th August, 2019) was sub factor. It was a 3 x 3 factorial combination laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Three cultivars of cocoyam and 3 planting dates (28th June, 28th July and 28th August, 2019) constituted (9) treatment combinations. Data were collected on number of leaves at maturity, plant height (cm), leaf area (cm2), stem girth, and number of corms. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant mean were separated using Fisher’s Least Significant Difference. The highest number of leaves was recorded in the month of June which gave a mean number of leaves of 3.92, followed by July and August, which gave 3.24 and 3.00 respectively. So, number of leaves recorded for June showed that June was significantly different from the month of July and August. Plant height was highest in the month of June. The highest number of corms was recorded in the month of June as 26.2 followed by August then July, 18.0 and 17.8 respectively. The analysis of variance showed that the interaction between cocoyam cultivars and months of planting dates was not significant with regard to the number of corms of different cultivars of cocoyam.
| Agueguia, A., Fatokun, A. C., & Hahn, S. K. (1992) protein analysis of ten cocoyam, Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L) Schott and colocasia esculenta (L) Schott genotypes. Root crops for food security in Africa. Proceedings of the 5th Triennial symposium, kampala, Uganda, p. 348. | ||||
| Balali, G. R., Hadi, M. R., Yavari, P., Bidram H., Naderi A. G., Eslami A. (2008). Effect of pot size, planting date and genotype on mini tuber production of Marfonapotato cultivar. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(9), 1265-1270. | ||||
| Bussell, W. T., & Bonin, M. J. (1998) Effects of high and low watering levels on growth and development of taro. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 26(4), 313-317. Crossref |
||||
| Deblonde, P. M. K., & Ledent, J. F. (2001). Effects of moderate drought conditions on green leaf number, stem height, leaf length and tuber yield of potato cultivars. European Journal of Agronomy, 14(1), 31-41. Crossref |
||||
| Dimelu, M. U., Okoye, A. C., Okoye, B. C., & Agwu, A. E. (2008). Determinants of gender efficiency of small-holder cocoyam farmers in Nsukka Agricultural Zone of Enugu State. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Agricultural society of Nigeria, Ebony State University, Abakaliki. Pp. 993-998. | ||||
| Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2012). FAO Statistical yearbook world food and agriculture, Rome, Italy. Food and agriculture organization of the united Nation. | ||||
| Kawakami, J., Iwama, K., & Jitsuyama, Y. (2006) Soil water stress and the growth and yield of potato plants grown from micro tubers and conventional seed tubers. Field Crops Research, 95(1), 89-96. Crossref |
||||
| Lebot, V., Ivancic, A., Quero-García, J. (2006). Comparative performance of local and introduced cultivars of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) in Vanuatu. In: Proceedings of the 14th Symposium of the International Society for Tropical Root Crops. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India, 20-26 November, (ISTRC). | ||||
| Manner, H. I., & Taylor. M. (2010). Farm and forestry production and marketing profile for taro (Colocasia esculenta). In: Eleviteh, C. R. (ed). Specially crops for pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR) Holualoa. Hawaii. | ||||
| McFarland, D. G., & Barko, J. W. (1990). Temperature and daylength effects on growth and tuber formation in Hydrilla. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 28(1), 15-19. | ||||
| Obi, I. U. (2002). Statistical Methods of detecting differences between treatment means and Research Methodology. Issues in Laboratory and field experiments. AP Express Publishers 117. | ||||
| Okoli, E. E., & Okoronkwo, C. M. (2020). Heritability and combining ability estimates among seven varieties of maize in South-eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 9(2), 98-107. | ||||
| Omenyo, E. L., Quain, M. D., Moses, E., Asumadu, H., Acheampong, P. P., & Ankomah, A. A. (2013). Farmer participatory development of cocoyam (Xanthosoma Sagittifolium, Linn, Schott) Cultivars. International Journal of Science Innovations and Discoveries, 3(1), 74-85. | ||||
| Osuji, J. O., & Nwala, P. C. (2015). Epidermal and cytological studies on cultivars of Xanthosoma (L.) Schott and Colocasia (L.) Schott. International Journal of Plant and Soil Science, 4, 149-155. Crossref |
||||
| Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie J. H. (1980). Principles and procedures of statistics. A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill International Book Co. NY. p. 633. | ||||