JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Integrity Research Journals

ISSN: 2536-7072
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASP
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasp@integrityresjournals.org


Influence of different seasons and row arrangements on growth and yield of maize and kenaf and mechanical properties of kenaf fibre in maize/kenaf intercrop

https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2016.012   |   Article Number: 8DE8466B1   |   Vol.1 (4) - December 2016

Received Date: 09 June 2016   |   Accepted Date: 11 October 2016  |   Published Date: 30 December 2016

Authors:  Amujoyegbe B. J.* , Ogbonna N. S. and O. K. Akinbo

Keywords: Kenaf, maize, yield., mechanical properties, intercrop, row arrangement

Four field experiments were carried out from 2012 to 2013 to assess the influence of different seasons and row arrangements on growth, yield of maize and kenaf and mechanical properties of kenaf fibre in maize/kenaf intercrop at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Four maize/kenaf component ratios of 1 row of maize alternated with 1 row of kenaf (1:1), 1 row of maize alternated with 2 rows of kenaf (1:2), 2 rows of maize alternated with 1 row of kenaf (2:1) and 2 rows of maize alternated with 2 rows of kenaf (2:2) and two control treatments namely; sole maize and sole kenaf were laid in a randomized complete block design in three replications. Growth parameters such as plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and plant biomass were measured on the component crops from four weeks after planting and subsequently at two weeks interval until physiological maturity of maize. Yield parameters such as ear length, ear diameter, kernel per ear, shelling percentage and grain yield/ha were measured on maize while retted fibre yield/ha was measured on kenaf at flowering. The mechanical properties of the kenaf fibre were determined on the retted kenaf. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and the significant mean values were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at p ≤ 0.05. Results indicated that season and row arrangement significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected growth and grain yield of maize and fibre yield of kenaf. The 1:2 and 2:2 row arrangements compared favourably with sole cropping on the mechanical properties of kenaf fibre. Row arrangement of 1:2 and 2:2 and sole cropping significantly (p ≤ 0.05) affected tensile strength of kenaf fibre relative to 2:1 and 1:1 row arrangement. Thus, lower maize/kenaf ratio would promote optimum yield and good fibre quality of kenaf fibre.

Andrew, D. J., & Kassam, A.H., (1976). The Importance of Multiple Cropping in Increasing World Food Supplies. In: Multiple Cropping, Papendick, R.I., A. Sanchez and G.B. Triplett (Eds.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. 5, 1-10.
 
Asante, A. K. (1993). Spatial arrangement on maize and kenaf intercropping. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science, 24 (27), 99-104.
 
Ayeni, A. O. (1987). Maize production in Nigeria: Problems and prospects. Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2, 123-129.
 
Christou, M., Mardikis, M., & Alexopoulou, E. (2000). The influence of sowing time and plant population on kenaf growth and yields. Biomass and Energy Crops II. AAB: Warwick, p.55.
 
Egbe, O. M. (2010). Effects of plant density of intercropped soybean with tall sorghum on competitive ability of soybean and economic yield at Otobi, Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds 1(1), 1-10.
 
Francis, C. A., & Adipala, E. (1994). Tropical intercropping systems: What is their future? African Crop Science Journal. 2, 131-133
 
Gomez, K. A., & Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical procedure for agricultural research. 2nd.Edition, John Wiley & Sons Co N.Y. Pp. 680.
 
Harpstead, M. (1973). A classification of some Nigerian soils. Soil Sci. 116, 437-443
Crossref
 
Kang, B. T., & Balasubramanian, V. (1990). Long Term Fertilizer Trial on Alfisols in West Africa. In Transactions of XIV International Soil Science Society (ISSS) congress, Kyoto, Japan. p. 350.
 
Kuchinda, N. C., & Ogunwole, J. O. (2000). Effects of dates and row arrangement on crop growth and yield in kenaf/maize mixture in the northern guinea savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. 2, 251-256.
 
Maryam, A. B., Saied, K. K., Seyed, H. S., Mandana, D., Khodadad, M., & Mohammad, G. (2011). A Study on Effects of Planting Dates on Growth and Yield of 18 Corn Hybrids (Zea mays L.) American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1(3), 110-120.
Crossref
 
Natarajan. M., & Willey, R. W. (1985). Effect of row arrangement on light interception and yield in sorghum-pigeon pea intercropping. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge), 104, 263-270.
Crossref
 
Parry, M. A. J., Flexas, J., & Medrano, H. (2005). Prospects for crop production under drought: research priorities and future directions. Annals of Applied Biology, 147, 211-226.
Crossref
 
Petrini, C., Bazzocch, R. I., & Montalti, P. (1994). Yield potential and adaptation of Kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) in north-central Italy. Industrial Crops and Products Journal 3, 11-15.
Crossref
 
Raji, J. A. (2008). The Feasibility of Intercropping Kenaf with Sorghum in a Small-Holder Farming System. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 32(2), 355 - 364.
Crossref
 
Saka, J. O., Adeniyan, O. N., Akande, S. R., & Balogun, M. O. (2007). An Economic Evaluation of Intercropping African Yam Bean, Kenaf and Maize in the Rain Forest Zone of Nigeria. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 2 (1), 01-08.
 
SAS Institute (2001). SAS user's guide. Statistics version 5th Ed. SAS Institute, Cory, NC, U.S.A.
 
Shanmugasundaram, S. (1979). International Cooperator's Guide. Evaluating AVDRC (Asian Vegetable Research and Development Centre) soybeans. AVDRC Shanhua, Taiwan. Pp. 79-125
 
Steel, S. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and procedure of statistics. A biometrical approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc. London. p. 663.
 
Thayamini, H. Seran & Brintha, I. (2010). Review on Maize Based Intercropping. Journal of Agronomy, 9, 135-145.
Crossref
 
Tsubo, M., Walker, S., & Mukhala. E. (2003). Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crop Research. 71, 17-29.
Crossref
 
Whingham, D. K. (1975). International soybean variety improvement: First report of results. University of Illinois, Urban Campaign. INTSDY series, 8, 11.
 
Wilson, F. D., Summers, T. E., Joyner, J. F., Fishler, D. W., & Seale, C. C. (1965). 'Everglades 41' and 'Everglades 71', two new varieties of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) for the fiber and seed. Florida Agricultural Experimental Station, Belle Glade. Cir. S-168.