ISSN: 2536-7072
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASP
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasp@integrityresjournals.org
https://doi.org/10.31248/JASP2016.013 | Article Number: 5A0676771 | Vol.1 (3) - October 2016
Received Date: 13 July 2016 | Accepted Date: 18 August 2016 | Published Date: 30 October 2016
Authors: Ugbabe, O. O.* , Ahmed, B. , Abdoulaye, T. and Kamara, A. Y.
Keywords: Crop technologies, impact, promoted, superior, Sudan Savannah.
In Kano and Katsina States of Nigeria, some promoted improved crop production practices had been tested since 2008 in a series of farmer-managed field trials in four Innovation Platforms (two each) in these States representing the Sudan Savannah (SS) ecological zone of Nigeria. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of improved crop production practices of Sudan Savannah Task Force on the income and technical efficiency of the farming households in Katsina State. The study used primary data collected in 2011 cropping season with the aid of questionnaires. A total of 300 households were interviewed in the State. The tools used for analysis of the data were the double difference estimator and the stochastic production function. The result showed that the adopters of the introduced technologies enjoyed an increment of 744.35% in income. All the coefficients of the inputs in the production function were positive and statistically significant. The mean technical efficiency for the adopters and non-adopters were 0.87 and 0.65 respectively. The study concluded that the introduced technologies enhanced the income and efficiency in crop production of the adopters.
| Arega, A., Manyong, V. M., Gockowski, J., Coulibaly, O., & Abele, S. (2006). A Framework for Conceptualising Impact Assessment and Promoting Impact Culture in Agricultural Research. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Pp. 1-30. | ||||
| Ayanwale, A., Abdoulaye, T. B., Ayedun, B., & Akinola, A. (2009). Baseline report of the sudan Savannah zone of the Kano-Katsina-Maradi (KKM) Project Learning Site (PLS) of the Sub-Saharan Africa Challenge Programme (SSA CP). International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Press, Ibadan. Pp. 1-57. | ||||
| Baker, J. (2000). Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners. Washington, D.C: World Bank: p. 10. Crossref |
||||
| Coelli, T. (1996). A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Programme for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation". CEPA Working Paper 96/07, University of New England, Armidale, Australia. | ||||
| Doss, C. R. (2003). Understanding Farm Level Technology Adoption: Lessons Learned from CIMMYT's Micro Surveys in Eastern Africa. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT). Economics Working Paper, 3(7). Mexico. | ||||
| Farrel, J. M. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistics, 120(3), 253-290. Crossref |
||||
| Gertler, P. J, Martinez, S, Premand, P, Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. J. (2011). Impact Evaluation in Practice. World Bank. Washington DC. | ||||
| Impact Assessment and Evaluation Group. (1999). Impact Assessment of Agricultural Research; Context and the Art. Paper presented at ASARECA\ECART\CTA Workshop on Impact Assessment of Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa, Entebbe, Uganda, 16-19 November, Pp. 15-21. | ||||
| Kumbhaker, S. C., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref |
||||
| Manyong, V. M., Douthwaite, B., Coulibaly, O., & Keatinge, J. D. H. (2001). Participatory Impact Assessment at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; Functions and Mechanism (Annex). in The Future of Impact Assessment in the CGIAR: Needs, Constraints and Options. Proceedings of a workshop organised by the standing panel on Impact Assessment of Technical Advisory Committee, 3-5, May, 2000. FAO, Rome, Italy, Pp. 69-74. | ||||
| Ojo, S. O. (2003). Productivity and Technical Efficiency of Poultry Egg Production in Nigeria. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2(6), 459-464. Crossref |
||||
| Ojo, S. O., & Ajibefun, I. A. (2000). Effects of Training on Labour Productivity and Efficiency in Oil Palm Production in Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 2, 275-279. | ||||
| Olayemi, J. K., Fadahunsi, A., & Adejobi, A. O. (2004). The Challenge of Building Democratic, Sustainable Peasants' Societies for a Developed Nigeria. Technical report presented at the Third World Forum Workshop, CESAG, 2-5 November, 2004, Dakar, Senegal. | ||||
| Piesse, J., & Thirtle, C. (2000). A Stochastic Frontier Approach to Firm Level Efficiency, Technological Change, and Productivity during the Early Transition in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28, 473-501. Crossref |
||||
| Ravallion, M. (1994). Poverty Comparisons. Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics. Harwood Academic, 56, 4. | ||||
| Tadesse, B., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (1997). Technical efficiency in paddy farms of Tamil Nadu: An analysis based on farm size and Ecological Zone. Agricultural Economics, 16, 185-192. Crossref |
||||
| Temel, T, Janssen, W., & Karimov, F. (2002). The Agricultural Innovation System of Azerbaijan: An Assessment of Institutional Linkages. Country Report 64, International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague. | ||||
| Usman, S. (2009). Analysis of Farm Plan and Resource Use Efficiency in Sesame Production in Jigawa State, Nigeria. M.Sc Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, 189pp. | ||||
| White, H. (2006). Impact Evaluation: The Experience of the Independent Evaluation Group of the World Bank. World Bank. Washington DC: 3. World Bank poverty group on impact evaluation. Washington DC. USA. | ||||
| World Bank (2008). World Bank Poverty Group on Impact Evaluation. Washington DC. USA. | ||||