RESEARCH JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
Integrity Research Journals
ISSN: 2536-7080
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/RJFSN
Start Year: 2016
Email: rjfsn@integrityresjournals.org
Comparative evaluation of the sensory properties of fish and beef Kilishi (roasted) as food snacks
https://doi.org/10.31248/RJFSN2022.153 | Article Number: 522403AA2 | Vol.7 (5) - December 2022
Received Date: 14 October 2022 | Accepted Date: 16 November 2022 | Published Date: 30 December 2022
Authors: Okeke, P. A.* , Adibe, A. C. , Evulobi, O. O. C. , Okoye, A. E. and Amuneke, K. E.
Keywords: fish, processing, Beef, general acceptability, Kilishi, kiln, organoleptic properties
The organoleptic evaluation of kilishi produced from beef and fish was carried out to test the acceptability of fish kilishi as a possible replacement beef with fish in kilishi production, due to high cost of beef meat in relation fish. There was significant difference (p<0.05) in the prices of beef and fish meat of 50%. The same weight of beef and fish samples was processed separately with the same quantity and quality of ingredients, to obtain a beef and fish kilishi product of 10% moisture content. The sensory evaluation of the produced Kilishi was carried out using 9-point hedonic scale with thirty trained panellists. The data generated were subjected to ANOVA test at 0.05 significant level, using SPSS version 20. The mean result score by the panellists for fish kilishi based on colour, taste, aroma, texture and overall acceptability were 6.83±1.21, 6.40±1.48, 6.57±1.38, 6.93±1.26 and 7.37±0.99, respectively. While that of beef Kilishi were 7.50±0.90, 7.33±1.09, 7.23±1.10, 7.10±1.16 and 7.77±0.94, respectively. The beef kilishi had a general acceptability score of 7.77±0.94 which reads ‘like moderately’ while that of fish kilishi has a general acceptability score of 7.37±0.99 which reads ‘liked moderately’. This study shows that fish kilishi can serve as suitable alternative to beef kilishi as a cheap snack that can provide cheap source of animal protein there by improve the quality of people’s health.
| Abdullahi, N., Ariahu, C. C., & Abu, J. O. (2016). Effect of chemical hurdles on sensory attributes of kilishi. Annals. Food Science and Technology, 17(2), 452-457. | ||||
| Adibe, A. C., Okeke, P. A., & Arinze, O. M. (2018). Evaluation of the organoleptic properties of Clarias gariepinus smoked with natural and artificial spices. Biomedicine and Nursing, 4(4), 92-96. | ||||
| Aliya, G., Humaid, K., Nasser, A., Sami, G., Aziz, K., Nashwa, M., & Ponnerassery, S. S. (2012). Effect of the freshness of starting material on the final product quality of dried salted shark. Advanced Journal of Food Science Technology, 4(2), 60-63. | ||||
| Apata, E. S., Kukuk, L. A., Apata, O. C., Adeyemi, K. O. (2013). Evaluation of suya (Tsire). An intermediate moisture meat production in Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of Food Resources, 2(1), 87-93. Crossref |
||||
| Barceloux, D. G. (2000). Medical and nursing toxicology of natural substance. Barceloux, D. G. (ed). John Wiley and Son, Hoboken, NJ. Pp. 77-83 | ||||
| Bichi, A. H., Ochukwu, I. J., & Idris, S. (2016). Nutrient analysis of fried fish and smoked fishes from three major markets in Katsina State, Nigeria. Proceedings of 31st Annual National Conference of Fisheries Society of Nigeria, Held in Katsina, Katsina State, Nigeria from 30th October to 4tt November, 2016. pp. 209-212. | ||||
| Peryam, D. R., & Girardot, N. R (1998). Advanced taste-test method. Quarter Master Food and Container Institute for the Armed Forces. | ||||
| Food and Agricultural Organization (2010). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome. Link |
||||
| Igene, J. O., Farouk, M. M., & Akanobi, C. T. (1990). Preliminary studies on the traditional processing of kilishi. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 50(1), 89-98. Crossref |
||||
| Iheagwara, M. C., & Okonkwo, T. M. (2016). Physicochemical and organization characteristics of Kilishi sausage as affected by storage duration and ingredient foundation. Journal of Food Research and Technology, 4, 01-09. | ||||
| Ikutegbe, V., & Sikoki, F. (2014). Microbiological and biochemical spoilage of smoke-dried fishes sold in West African open markets. Food Chemistry, 161, 332-336. Crossref |
||||
| Mosarrat, N. N., Gulsan, A. L., Shubbash, C. C., Farzana, B. F., & Mohajira, B. (2016). Study on the quality and safety aspect of four types of smoked-dried chapila (Gudusia chapra | ||||
| Hamilton-Buchanam, 1822) fish. International Journal of Advanced Science and Research, 1(10), 35-39. | ||||
| Muhammadi, R. A. (2020). Sokoto kilishi adds more taste. Daily trust, May 7th 2020. www.dailytrust.com.ng. | ||||
| Ogunsola, O. O., & Omojola, A. B. (2008). Qualitative evaluation of Kilishi prepared Irons beef and port. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(11), 53-58. Crossref |
||||
| Muhd, I. U., Sambo, M. U., Nasir, M., & Idris, S. (2016). Evaluation of Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Preserved in Jerusalem (Cnidoscolus aconitifolus) leaf extract. Proceedings of 31st Annual National Conference of Fisheries Society of Nigeria, Held in Katsina, Katsina State from 30th October to 4th November 2016. Pp. 237-239. | ||||
| Ojutiku, R. U., Kolo, R. J., & Mohammed, M. L. (2009). Comparative study of sun drying and solar tent drying of Hyperopisus bebe occidentalis. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 8(7), 955-957. Crossref |
||||
| Okeke, P. A., Nwigwe, H. C., Nwosu, M. C., & Arazu, V. N. (2016). A comparative study of effects of different articial starter feeds on growth and survival of Clarias gariepinus. Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 31(2B), 443-454. Crossref |
||||
| Okeke, P. A., Adibe, A. C., Ezenwenyi, J. U., Ogbonnaya, H. F., & Moghalu, K. (2020). Evaluation of the effects of Anthonotha macrophtlla (hardwood), Dialium guineense (softwood) and gas oven on the nutrient composition and organoleptic properties of smoked dried Clarias gariepinus. Journal of Biomedicine and Nursing, 6(2), 65-69 | ||||
| Okereke, A. N., & Ezeafulukwe, C. F. (2016). Different Smoke Sources on the Nutritional Composition and Sensory Properties of Catfish Clarias gariepinus. Proceedings of 31st Annual National Conference of Fisheries Society of Nigeria, Held in Katsina, Katsina State, Nigeria. From 30th October to 4th November, 2016. Pp. 240-242 | ||||
| Olagbemide, P. T. (2015). Nutritional values of smoked Clarias Gariepinus from major markets in southwest, Nigeria. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, (D), 15(6), 32-42. | ||||
| Olusola, O. O., Okubanjo, A. O., & Omojola, A. B. (2012). Nutritive and organoleptic characteristics of Kilishi as affected by meat type and ingredients formulation. Journal of Animal Production Advances, 2(5), 221-232. | ||||
| Guillén, M. D., & Errecalde, M. C. (2002). Volatile components of raw and smoked black bream (Brama raii) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) studied by means of solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 82(9), 945-952. Crossref |
||||
| Ricketts, A. O. (2019). Biochemical and Microbiological Assessment of Smoked Dried Clarias gariepinus. Journal of Food Process and Technology 10(2), 775. | ||||
Copyright © 2025 Integrity Research Journals. All rights reserved.