JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND VETERINARY MEDICINE
Integrity Research Journals

ISSN: 2536-7099
Model: Open Access/Peer Reviewed
DOI: 10.31248/JASVM
Start Year: 2016
Email: jasvm@integrityresjournals.org


Effect of adding varying eubiotic addictive on digestive tract parameters, serum metabolites and growth performance of growing pigs

https://doi.org/10.31248/JASVM2021.282   |   Article Number: 1F081D976   |   Vol.7 (1) - February 2022

Received Date: 05 July 2021   |   Accepted Date: 15 August 2021  |   Published Date: 28 February 2022

Author:  Obongekpe, R. P.

Keywords: performance., pig, feed additives, digestive tract

The purpose of the study was to determine the combined efficacy of feed additives on growing pigs, performance and digestive tract parameters. The experiment was conducted for 28 days with 48 male piglets allocated to six dietary treatments. Group 1 was offered a diet without eubiotic; 2 – a diet with acids mixture; 3 – phytobiotic, medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) and yeast; 4 – probiotic, MCFA, and yeast; 5 – phytobiotic, probiotic, acids mixture, and sodium butyrate; 6 – phytobiotic, probiotic, MCFA, and sodium butyrate. The average daily weight gains and feed intake were recorded. Blood samples, digesta samples, and ileal tissue samples were collected for studies. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in weight gain, feed intake, or FCR among the treatments as well as in the ileal and caecal pH value, microbial content, and total SCFA content in caecal digesta as the level of inclusion increases.  However, there was a significant difference in treatment condition 2 to 4. Ammonia content in ileal digesta was significantly higher compared to other groups as caecal digesta was significantly higher in group 6 in comparison with groups 1 and 2. Villi height was significantly higher (p<0.05) in groups 2, 3 and 6 compared to the control. Villi height to crypt depth ratio was significantly higher (p<0.05) in groups 5 and 2, but the most promising effects seem to be from combinations 3 and 4. In comparison with control: in groups 2, 3 and 5 higher Alanine transaminase, glucose and triglyceride; in groups 3, 4 and 5 higher total protein and cholesterol; in group 4 higher albumin and in group 6 higher BUN, were found. Generally, it was concluded that; used eubiotic preparations have significant effect on the gut morphology, growth performance, microbiota and some blood parameters but in smaller ration. It was therefore recommended that eubiotic feeds should be included in pigs feed in smaller ration if the desirable effect is to be determined.

Bael, A. B., & Roxas, D. B. (2013). Effects of yeast-based non-nutritional enhancers on the performance of weanling pigs. Philippine Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 39(1), 71-80.
 
Barszcz, M., Taciak, M., & Skomiał, J. (2011). A dose-response effects of tannic acid and protein on growth performance, caecal fermentation, colon morphology, and β-glucuronidase activity of rats. Journal of Animal Feed Science, 20, 613-625.
Crossref
 
Barszcz, M., Taciak, M., & Skomiał, J. (2016). The effects of inulin, dried Jerusalem artichoke tuber and a multispecies probiotic preparation on microbiota ecology and immune status of the large intestine in young pigs. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 70(4), 278-292.
Crossref
 
Bartoš, P., Dolan, A., Smutný, L., Šístková, M., Celjak, I., Šoch, M., & Havelka, Z. (2016). Effects of phytogenic feed additives on growth performance and on ammonia and greenhouse gases emissions in growing-finishing pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 212, 143-148.
Crossref
 
Botsoglou, N. A., Florou-Paneri, P., Christaki, E., Fletouris, D. J., & Spais, A. B. (2002). Effect of dietary oregano essential oil on performance of chickens and on iron-induced lipid oxidation of breast, thigh and abdominal fat tissues. British Poultry Science, 43(2), 223-230.
Crossref
 
Brestoff, J. R., & Artis, D. (2013). Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system. Nature immunology, 14(7), 676-684.
Crossref
 
Chwen, L. T., Foo, H. L., Thanh, N. T., & Choe, D. W. (2013). Growth performance, plasma fatty acids, villous height and crypt depth of preweaning piglets fed with medium chain triacylglycerol. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 26(5), 700-704.
Crossref
 
Costa, L. B., Berenchtein, B., Almeida, V. V., Tse, M. L. P., Braz, D. B., Andrade, A. C., Mourão, G. B., & Miyada, V. S. (2011). Phytobiotic additives and sodium butyrate as growth promoters of weanling pigs. Archivos de zootecnia, 60(231), 687-698.
Crossref
 
Fang, C. L., Sun, H., Wu, J., Niu, H. H., & Feng, J. (2014). Effects of sodium butyrate on growth performance, haematological and immunological characteristics of weanling piglets. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 98(4), 680-685.
Crossref
 
Fouhse, J. M., Zijlstra, R. T., & Willing, B. P. (2016). The role of gut microbiota in the health and disease of pigs. Animal Frontiers, 6(3), 30-36.
Crossref
 
Gheisar, M. M., & Kim, I. H. (2018). Phytobiotics in poultry and swine nutrition-a review. Italian journal of animal science, 17(1), 92-99.
Crossref
 
Grajek, K., Sip, A., Foksowicz-Flaczyk, J., Dobrowolska, A., & Wita, A. (2016). Adhesive and hydrophobic properties of the selected LAB isolated from gastrointestinal tract of farming animals. Acta Biochimica Polonica, 63(2), 311-314.
Crossref
 
Grashorn, M. A. (2010). Use of phytobiotics in broiler nutrition-an alternative to infeed antibiotics. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 19(3), 338-347.
Crossref
 
Han, G. G., Lee, J. Y., Jin, G. D., Park, J., Choi, Y. H., Chae, B. J., Kim, E. B., & Choi, Y. J. (2017). Evaluating the association between body weight and the intestinal microbiota of weaned piglets via 16S rRNA sequencing. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101(14), 5903-5911.
Crossref
 
Hanczakowska, E., Szewczyk, A., Swiatkiewicz, M., & Okon, K. (2013). Short-and medium-chain fatty acids as a feed supplement for weaning and nursery pigs. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16(4), 647-654.
Crossref
 
Hill, C., Guarner, F., Reid, G., Gibson, G. R., Merenstein, D. J., Pot, B. and Morelli, L., Canani, R. B., Flint, H. J., Salminen, S., Calder, P. C. and Sanders, M. E., (2014). The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. National Reverence Gastroenterology Hepatology, 11, 506-514.
Crossref
 
Hong, S. M., Hwang, J. H., & Kim, I. H. (2012). Effect of medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics in weanling pigs. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 25(7), 1003-1008.
Crossref
 
Houshmand, M., Azhar, K., Zulkifli, I., Bejo, M. H., & Kamyab, A. (2011). Effects of non-antibiotic feed additives on performance, nutrient retention, gut pH, and intestinal morphology of broilers fed different levels of energy. Journal of Applied Poultry Resources, 20(2), 121-128.
Crossref
 
Huang, C., Song, P., Fan, P., Hou, C., Thacker, P., & Ma, X. (2015). Dietary sodium butyrate decreases postweaning diarrhea by modulating intestinal permeability and changing the bacterial communities in weaned piglets. The Journal of Nutrition, 145(12), 2774-2780.
Crossref
 
Li, Y., Zhang, H., Yang, L., Zhang, L., & Wang, T. (2015). Effect of medium-chain triglycerides on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma metabolites and antioxidant capacity in weanling pigs. Animal Nutrition, 1(1), 12-18.
Crossref
 
Liao, S. F., & Nyachoti, M. (2017). Using probiotics to improve swine gut health and nutrient utilization. Animal Nutrition, 3(4), 331-343.
Crossref
 
Liu, Y., Espinosa, C. D., Abelilla, J. J., Casas, G. A., Lagos, L. V., Lee, S. A., Kwon, W. B., Mathai, J. K., Navarro, D. M., Jaworski, N. W., & Stein, H. H. (2018). Non-antibiotic feed additives in diets for pigs: A review. Animal Nutrition, 4(2), 113-125.
Crossref
 
Long, S. F., Xu, Y. T., Pan, L. Wang, Q. Q., Wang, C. L., Wu, J. Y., Wu, Y. Y., Han, Y. M., Yun, C. H., Xiangshu, P. (2018). Mixed organic acids as antibiotic substitutes improve performance, serum immunity, intestinal morphology and microbiota for weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science Technology, 235, 23-22.
Crossref
 
Metges, C. C. (2010). Classical and post-genomic methods to study GIT function with emphasis on the pig. Livestock Science, 133(1-3), 10-19.
Crossref
 
Metzler, B., Bauer, E., & Mosenthin, R. (2005). Microflora management in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets. Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 18(9), 1353-1362.
Crossref
 
Muñoz, R., Tor, M., & Estany, J. (2012). Relationship between blood lipid indicators and fat content and composition in Duroc pigs. Livestock Science, 148(1-2), 95-102.
Crossref
 
Namkung, H., Li J. Gong, M., Yu, H., Cottrill, M., & De Lange, C. F. M. (2004). Impact of feeding blends of organic acids and herbal extracts on growth performance, gut microbiota and digestive function in newly weaned pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 84(4), 697-704.
Crossref
 
Nowak, P., Kasprowicz-Potocka, M., Zaworska, A., Nowak, W., Stefańska, B., Sip, A., Grajek, W., Juzwa, W., Taciak, M., Barszcz, M., Tuśnio, A., Grajek, K., Foksowicz - Flaczyk, J., & Frankiewicz, A. (2017). The effect of eubiotic feed additives on the performance of growing pigs and the activity of intestinal microflora. Archives of animal nutrition, 71(6), 455-469.
Crossref
 
Pereira, C. M. C., Donzele, J. L., Silva, F. C. D. O., Oliveira, R. F. M. D., Kiefer, C., Ferreira, A. S., Hannas, M. I., & Brustolini, P. C. (2012). Yeast extract with blood plasma in diets for piglets from 21 to 35 days of age. Revista brasileira de zootecnia, 41(7), 1676-1682.
Crossref
 
Piyadeatsoontorn, S., Taharnklaew, R., Upathanpreecha, T., & Sornplang, P. (2019). Encapsulating viability of multi-strain Lactobacilli as potential probiotic in pigs. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 11(2), 438-446.
Crossref
 
Rauw, W. M., Portolés, O., Corella, D., Soler, J., Reixach, J., Tibau, J., Prat, J. M., Diaz, I., & Gómez-Raya, L. (2007). Behaviour influences cholesterol plasma levels in a pig model. Animal, 1(6), 865-871.
Crossref
 
Santini, C., Baffoni, L., Gaggia, F., Granata, M., Gasbarri, R., DiGioia, D., Bia - vati, B. (2010). Characterization of probiotic strains: An application as feed additives in poultry against Campylobacter jejuni. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141(Supplement 1), 98-108.
Crossref
 
Suiryanrayna, M. V., & Ramana, J. V. (2015). A review of the effects of dietary organic acids fed to swine. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 6, Article Number 45.
Crossref
 
Uni, Z., Platin, R., & Sklan, D. (1998). Cell proliferation in chicken intestinal epithelium occurs both in the crypt and along the villus. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 168(4), 241-247.
Crossref
 
Van der Meulen, J., & Jansman, A. J. M. (1997). Nitrogen metabolism in gastrointestinal tissue of the pig. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 56(2), 535-545.
Crossref
 
Vidanarachchi, J. K., Mikkelsen, L. L., Sims, I., Iji, P. A., & Choct, M. (2005). Phytobiotics: alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in monogastric animal feeds. Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia, 15, 131-144.
 
Windisch, W., Schedle, K., Plitzner, C., & Kroismayr, A. (2008). Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science, 86(suppl 14), E140-E148.
Crossref
 
Winnicka, A. (2011). Wartości referencyjne podstawowych badań laboratoryjnych w weterynarii (in Polish). The reference values of basic laboratory tests in veterinary medicine (in English). Ed. SGGW Warszawa.